CASE REPORT |
https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10033-1603 |
Waltman Walter Syndrome—A Rare Postcholecystectomy Presentation: A Case Report
1–6Department of General Surgery, Apollo Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Hyderabad, Telangana, India
Corresponding Author: Subrahmanya Narayan Dora Kurumella, Department of General Surgery, Apollo Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Hyderabad, Telangana, India, Phone: +91 8978766781, e-mail: ksnarayanvirat@gmail.com
How to cite this article: Sridhar L, Phadnis R, Hussain F, et al. Waltman Walter Syndrome—A Rare Postcholecystectomy Presentation: A Case Report. World J Lap Surg 2024;17(1):58–60.
Source of support: Nil
Conflict of interest: None
Patient consent statement: The author(s) have obtained written informed consent from the patient for publication of the case report details and related images.
Received on: 24 November 2023; Accepted on: 20 December 2023; Published on: 14 February 2024
ABSTRACT
Waltman Walter syndrome after laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is rarely reported. However, it needs to be recognized promptly and managed as otherwise it can lead to further metabolic and infective complications. We present the case of a 42-year-old male who was admitted with ultrasound-proven cholelithiasis with no signs of cholecystitis and with a history of acute calculous cholecystitis. His total leukocytic count (TLC) and liver function tests (LFTs) were within normal limits. He underwent an uneventful LC with drain placement in Morrison’s pouch. Postoperatively, he had complaints of pain in the abdomen and fever, clinically icterus was present, tachycardia and multiple fever spikes with persistent hypotension, and ultrasonography (USG) abdomen was suggestive of fluid collection of 214 cc noted tracking along the subdiaphragmatic region extending into the gallbladder fossa. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) was done and was suggestive of a cystic stump leak for which biliary duct sphincterotomy + common bile duct (CBD) stenting was done. An USG-guided aspiration was done and bilious fluid was aspirated from subdiaphragmatic region. On postoperative day (POD) 10, the patients improved symptomatically, with a normal LFT, and the drain was removed; on follow-up after 4 weeks, he had no complaints, and stent removal was done. The main “take-home” message is that although rare, Waltman Walter syndrome is an unusual and rarely reported complication of post-LC particularly postdrain placement due to accumulation of bile in the subdiaphragmatic region. Timely response in diagnosing and bile drainage helps in the prevention of mortality and morbidity.
Keywords: Bile leak, Case report, Cystic duct stump leak, Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, Laparoscopic cholecystectomy, Postlaparoscopic cholecystectomy complication, Subdiaphragmatic collection.
INTRODUCTION
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is the gold standard for gallstone disease. Biliary complications after LC are rare and can predispose to fatal sepsis, The incidence is between 0.3 and 3%.1 Common causes of bile leak include cystic duct stump leak (CDSL), bile duct injury, duodenal injury, or bile leak from the duct of Luschka. Waltman Walter syndrome is a rare bile leak complication that requires prompt intervention due to the presence of accumulated bile in the subdiaphragmatic space.
CASE DESCRIPTION
A 42-year-old male diagnosed with acute calculous cholecystitis underwent LC with drain placement in Morrison’s pouch and intraoperative score Parkland classification – grade III (Fig. 1).2
On postoperative day 5, the patient had complaint of pain abdomen and fever, clinically icterus was present, tachycardia and multiple fever spikes with persistent hypotension; on examination, the patient was diagnosed with tenderness in the right hypochondrium, drain – 30 mL (Bilious), liver function test (LFT)-bilirubin – 3.23 (direct, 0.73; indirect, 2.5), total leukocytic count (TLC) – 15,000 and electrocardiography (ECG) was suggestive of no significant changes patient was clinically suspected to have biliary peritonitis. The patient was started on treatment accordingly.
An ultrasonography (USG) abdomen was suggestive of a Fluid collection of 214 cc noted tracking along the subdiaphragmatic region extending into the gallbladder fossa (Fig. 2).
Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) was done and was suggestive of a cystic stump leak for which biliary duct sphincterotomy + common bile duct (CBD) stenting was done (Fig. 3).
An USG-guided aspiration was done and bilious fluid was aspirated from subdiaphragmatic region and was sent for culture sensitivity which was suggestive of no growth.
On postoperative day (POD) 8, that is, 2 days after aspiration, patient condition improved clinically with zero drain output, and USG and liver function test (LFT) were repeated and were suggestive of normal findings.
The patient improved symptomatically and LFT and CBP were normal and was discharged on POD 10 with drain removal.
The patient was followed after 1 month. As clinically asymptomatic and normal LFT, stent removal was done.
DISCUSSION
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy has revolutionized the treatment of cholecystitis and cholelithiasis. However, the incidence of rare but serious complications, such as bile duct injuries and vascular injury, is twice as high in LC than in open cholecystectomy.3
The incidence of CDSL is 0.12% following LC.4
Waltman Walter syndrome is characterized by a triad of lower chest pain, hypotension, and tachycardia which occurs postsurgery on the biliary tract. Diagnosis of myocardial ischemia is the differential diagnosis to this triad and on repeated electrocardiographs suggestive of ischemic changes. Waltman Walter syndrome is due to the subdiaphragmatic collection of accumulated bile (Fig. 4) causing the liver to push downwards and medially. In the posterior aspect of the liver, the inferior vena cava gets compressed leading to decreased venous return, further leading to myocardial ischemia.5
Endoscopic stenting and sphincterotomy or percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage are performed most commonly to deviate the bile past the defect, as CDSL heals spontaneously.6
Tzovaras et al.7 reported that 80% of bile leaks are from CDSL post-LC. Furthermore, CDSL causes concluded from the study were due to displacement of clip, imperfect clip application, cystic duct stump necrosis, or injury related to electrosurgery. Also, CDSL is managed by endoscopic stent placement, endoscopic sphincterotomy, or combined.
Kaffes et al.8 study reported that 83% of patients had a bile leak and CDSL was the cause for 60% of those. Ninety five percent of those patients underwent endoscopic stenting or sphincterotomy. The study concluded the removal of the stent 4 weeks postprocedure with no need for cholangiography poststent removal.
About 90% of patients are endoscopically managed and ERCP is the first line of management (Table 1). Percutaneous drainage is indicated in large biloma collection.9
Causes |
---|
Misplacement or displacement of cystic duct clips |
Injury to cystic duct proximal to the clip: Electrosurgery and ischemia |
Inadvertent injury to the cystic duct |
The presence of retained CBD stones if not addressed postoperatively |
Short and wide cystic duct |
Possible suctioning of clips during post-LC wash and suction |
Prevention |
Caution in acute cholecystitis |
Caution in short and wide cystic duct |
Avoid cautery dissection at junction of cystic duct and bile duct |
CONCLUSION
Waltman Walter syndrome is an unusual and rarely reported complication of post-LC particularly postdrain placement due to accumulation of bile in sub diaphragmatic region. Timely response in diagnosing and bile drainage helps in prevention of mortality and morbidity.
ORCID
Subrahmanya Narayan Dora Kurumella https://orcid.org/0009-0002-3981-7766
REFERENCES
1. Ahmad F, Saunders RN, Lloyd GM, et al. An algorithm for the management of bile leak following laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2007;89(1):51–56. DOI: 10.1308/003588407X160864.
2. Madni TD, Nakonezny PA, Barrios E, et al. Prospective validation of the Parkland grading scale for cholecystitis. Am J Surg 2019;217(1):90–97. DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2018.08.005.
3. Fletcher DR, Hobbs MS, Tan P, et al. Complications of cholecystectomy: Risks of the laparoscopic approach and protective effects of operative cholangiography: A population-based study. Ann Surg 1999;229(4):449–457. DOI: 10.1097/00000658-199904000-00001.
4. Eisenstein S, Greenstein AJ, Kim U, et al. Cystic duct stump leaks: After the learning curve. Arch Surg 2008;143(12):1178–1183. DOI: 10.1001/archsurg.143.12.1178.
5. The surgical management of conditions commonly asssoiated with Jaundice by William James Irivine, B.Sc. (june 1958), pp. 39–49. Available from: https://era.ed.ac.uk/handle/1842/34751.
6. Barkun AN, Rezieg M, Mehta SN, et al. Postcholecystectomy biliary leaks in the laparoscopic era: Risk factors, presentation, and management. McGill Gallstone Treatment Group. Gastrointest Endosc 1997;45(3):277–282. DOI: 10.1016/s0016-5107(97)70270-0.
7. Tzovaras G, Peyser P, Kow L, et al. Minimally invasive management of bile leak after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. HPB (Oxford) 2001;3(2):165–168. DOI: 10.1080/136518201317077189.
8. Kaffes AJ, Hourigan L, De Luca N, et al. Impact of endoscopic intervention in 100 patients with suspected postcholecystectomy bile leak. Gastrointest Endosc 2005;61269–275. DOI: 10.1016/s0016-5107(04)02468-x.
9. Shaikh IAA, Thomas H, Joga K, et al. Postcholecystectomy cystic duct stump leak: A preventable morbidity. Journal of Digestive Diseases 2009;10(3):207–212. DOI: 10.1111/j.1751-2980.2009.00387.x.
________________________
© The Author(s). 2024 Open Access. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and non-commercial reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.