World Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery

Register      Login

VOLUME 10 , ISSUE 1 ( January-April, 2017 ) > List of Articles

RESEARCH ARTICLE

Laparoscopic Appendectomy as a Standard of Care for Both Complicated and Uncomplicated Appendicitis in South Africa, Is It Safe? Single Center Experience

Fusi Mosai, Zach M Koto

Citation Information : Mosai F, Koto ZM. Laparoscopic Appendectomy as a Standard of Care for Both Complicated and Uncomplicated Appendicitis in South Africa, Is It Safe? Single Center Experience. World J Lap Surg 2017; 10 (1):22-25.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10033-1296

Published Online: 01-04-2017

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2017; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.


Abstract

Aim

The aim of this descriptive analytical study was to describe the outcomes of using laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) as the standard of care for both complicated and uncomplicated cases of acute appendicitis in South Africa.

Background

Laparoscopic appendectomy has been widely accepted as safe when performed in uncomplicated cases of acute appendicitis. However, acceptance of this procedure as the standard of care has been surrounded by controversies, with the main concern been around the safety of this procedure in complicated cases of appendicitis. Currently, there is no consensus in published literature regarding the use of LA as the standard of care in both complicated and uncomplicated appendicitis.

Materials and methods

A retrospective analysis of all patients who were diagnosed with acute appendicitis at Dr George Mukhari Academic Hospital over a 3-year period was reviewed. Data were retrieved from our departmental database and analyzed using descriptive statistics.

Results

A total of 746 patients were reviewed and 576 were included in the study. All these patients were offered LA. The mean age was 26.37, with 66% of our patients been males. Complicated cases formed 38% of our total study population. Laparoscopic appendectomy was performed in both complicated and uncomplicated cases of appendicitis with a success rate of 96%. Intraoperative complication rate and the relook rate was 0.5 and 7% respectively, with an overall mortality of 1.7%.

Conclusion

The positive outcome found in this study when LA was used in both complicated and uncomplicated cases of acute appendicitis suggests that this approach is possible in carefully selected patients and with appropriate basic laparoscopic skills.

Clinical significance

Complicated appendicitis is not a contraindication to laparoscopy.

How to cite this article

Mosai F, Koto ZM. Laparoscopic Appendectomy as a Standard of Care for Both Complicated and Uncomplicated Appendicitis in South Africa, Is It Safe? Single Center Experience. World J Lap Surg 2017;10(1):22-25.


PDF Share
  1. Laparoscopic in the contemporary management of acute appendicitis. Am J Surg 2007 Mar;193(3):310-314.
  2. Meta analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing laparoscopic and conventional appendectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc 1999 Jan;9(1):17-26.
  3. A meta analysis of randomized controlled trials of laparoscopic versus conventional appendectomy. Am J Surg 1999 Mar;177(3):250-256.
  4. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: a meta analysis. J Am Coll Surg 1998 May;186(5):545-553.
  5. Laparoscopic or open appendectomy? Critical review of randomized controlled trials. Dis Colon Rectum 1998 Mar;41(3):398-403.
  6. A prospective randomized comparison of laparoscopic appendectomy with open appendectomy: clinical and economic analyses. Surgery 2001 Apr;129(4):390-400.
  7. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: time to decide. World J Surg 1999 Aug;23(8):835-845.
  8. Deriving the indications for laparoscopic appendectomy from a comparison of the outcomes of laparoscopic and open appendectomy. Am J Surg 2001 Dec;182(6):687-692.
  9. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: results of a retrospective comparison in an Israeli hospital. Isr Med Assoc J 2002 Feb;4:91-94.
  10. Efficacy of laparoscopy in complicated appendicitis. Int J Surg 2009 Jun;7(3):250-252.
  11. Laparoscopic appendectomy for complicated appendicitis. Arch Surg 1996 May;131(5):509-512.
  12. Intra abdominal abscesses following laparoscopic and open appendectomies. J Gastrointest Surg 1997 Mar-Apr;1(2):188-192.
  13. Laparoscopic appendectomy for complicated appendicitis: an evaluation of postoperative factors. Surg Endosc 2004 Jun;18(6):969-973.
  14. Laparoscopic appendectomy conversion rates two decades later: an analysis of surgeon and patient-specific factors resulting in open conversion. J Surg Res 2012 Jul;176(1):42-49.
  15. Laparoscopic appendectomy for complicated appendicitis at Sebokeng Hospital. J Dent Med Sci 2015 Dec;14(12):65-69.
  16. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy a prospective randomized double-blind study. Ann Surg 2005 Sep;242(3):439-450.
  17. Laparoscopic appendectomy. Br J Surg 1996 Sep;83(9):1169-1170.
  18. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy outcomes comparison based on a large administrative database. Ann Surg 2004 Jan;239(1):43-52.
  19. The use of the clinical scoring system by Alvarado in the decision to perform computed tomography for acute appendicitis in the ED. Am J Emerg Med 2007 Jun;25(5):489-493.
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.