World Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery

Register      Login

VOLUME 11 , ISSUE 2 ( May-August, 2018 ) > List of Articles


Laparoscopic versus open Varicocelectomy: An Observational Study

Shaukat Jeelani, Atif Naeem, Ishfaq A Gilkar, Javid A Peer, Umer Mushtaq

Keywords : Laparoscopic, Infertility, Varicocelectomy

Citation Information : Jeelani S, Naeem A, Gilkar IA, Peer JA, Mushtaq U. Laparoscopic versus open Varicocelectomy: An Observational Study. World J Lap Surg 2018; 11 (2):76-80.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10033-1339

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 01-12-2018

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2018; The Author(s).


Background: Varicocele is a collection of abnormally dilated, tortuous veins. A clinical varicocele is found in about 15% of all adult males, up to 35% of men who present for infertility evaluation and as many as 81% of men with secondary infertility, with a marked left-sided predominance. It is the most common correctable cause of male infertility. Methodology: This study was conducted in the postgraduate department of surgery, Government Medical College, Srinagar for 2 years from December 2010 till May 2013. This was a prospective study and a total of 100 patients with clinically significant varicocele were included in this study. Patients were divided into two groups. Group A comprised of 50 patients who underwent open surgery, and group B comprised of 50 patients who underwent a laparoscopic approach. Results: In our series of 100 patients, the minimum age was 10 and maximum was 50 years, eighty six had scrotal pain, 81 had testicular swelling and 25 patients presented with infertility, the operation time for laparoscopic varicocelectomy 48 minutes (mean) and in open surgery was 57 minutes (mean), We observed that postoperative analgesic requirement was almost equal in both groups, average hospital stay of 35.6 hours and 50.6 hours were observed in laparoscopic and open groups respectively. Conclusion: In our study of 100 patients it was observed that the results of laparoscopic varicocelectomy were comparable to open technique with minimum morbidity, shorter hospital stay and with the advantage of treating bilateral varicoceles without any additional incisions. Also, laparoscopic varicocelectomy produces better overall patient satisfaction and hence can be considered as a preferred surgical technique although sperm analysis results were the same in both methods.

PDF Share
  1. Choi WS, Kim SW. Current issues in varicocele management: a review. World J Mens Health. 2013 Apr;31(1):12-20.
  2. Clarke BG. Incidence of varicocele in normal men and among men of different ages. JAMA. 1966 Dec 5;198(10):1121-1122.
  3. Gorelick JI, Goldstein M. Loss of fertility in men with varicocele. Fertil Steril. March 1993;59:613-616.
  4. Alsaikhan B, Alrabeeah K, Delouya G, Zini A. Epidemiology of varicocele. Asian journal of andrology. 2016 Mar;18(2): 179-181.
  5. Dubin L, Amelar RD. Varicocele. Urol Clin North Am. 1978;5:563-572.
  6. Hargreave TB. Varicocele: A clinical enigma. Br J Urol. 1993 Oct;72(4):401-408.
  7. Bebars GA, et al. Laparoscopic versus open high ligation of the testicular veins for the treatment of varicocele. JSLS. 2000 Jul-Sep; 4(3): 209-213
  8. Lynch W J, Badenoch D F and Mcanena O J Comparison of Laparoscopic and open ligation of the testicular veins. British Journal of Urology dec 1993;72:796-798.
  9. Hagood PG, Mehan DJ, Worischeck JH, et al. Laparoscopic varicocelectomy: preliminary report of a new technique. J Urol Jan 1992;147:73-76.
  10. Al-Shareef ZH, Koneru SR, Al-Tayeb A, Shehata ZM, Aly TF, Basyouni A. Laparoscopic ligation of varicoceles: an anatomically superior operation. Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England. 1993 Sep;75(5):345-348.
  11. Jiménez AG, de la Torre García MV, de Badajoz Sánchez E. A decade of laparoscopic varicocelectomy: costs and learning stages. Archivos espanoles de urologia. 1999 Apr;52(3):245- 248.
  12. Matsuda T, Horii Y, Higashi S, Oishi K, Takeuchi H, Yoshida O. Laparoscopic varicocelectomy: a simple technique for clip ligation of the spermatic vessels. The Journal of urology. 1992 Mar 1;147(3):636-638.
  13. Shamsa A, Mohammadi L, Abolbashari M, Shakeri MT, Shamsa S. Comparison of open and laparoscopic varicocelectomies in terms of operative time, sperm parameters, and complications. Urology journal. 2009 Aug 20;6(3):170-175.
  14. Watanabe M, Nagai A, Kusumi N, Tsuboi H, Nasu Y, Kumon H. Minimal invasiveness and effectivity of subinguinal microscopic varicocelectomy: a comparative study with retroperitoneal high and laparoscopic approaches. International journal of urology. 2005 Oct;12(10):892-898.
  15. Koèvara R, DvoèÁèek J, SedlÁèek J, DÍT¢ E ZE, NOVÁK KE. Lymphatic sparing laparoscopic varicocelectomy: a microsurgical repair. The Journal of urology. 2005 May;173(5):1751- 1754.
  16. Al-Kandari AM, Shabaan H, Ibrahim HM, Elshebiny YH, Shokeir AA. Comparison of outcomes of different varicocelectomy techniques: open inguinal, laparoscopic, and subinguinal microscopic varicocelectomy: a randomized clinical trial. Urology. 2007 Mar 1;69(3):417-420.
  17. Osman T, El-Shourbagy A, Moustafa H, Maged W. Laparoscopic versus Open Retroperitoneal Bilateral Varix Ligation for Obese Patients Presenting with Primary Sub-Fertility: A Randomized Comparative Study. African Journal of Urology. 2004;10(1):50-57.
  18. Podkamenev VV, Stalmakhovich VN, Urkov PS, Solovjev AA, Iljin VP. Laparoscopic surgery for pediatric varicoceles: randomized controlled trial. Journal of pediatric surgery. 2002 May 1;37(5):727-729.
  19. Ogura K, Matsuda T, Terachi T, Horii Y, Takeuchi H, Yoshida O. Laparoscopic varicocelectomy: invasiveness and effectiveness compared with conventional open retroperitoneal high ligation. International Journal of Urology. 1994 Mar;1(1):62-66.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.