World Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery

Register      Login

VOLUME 11 , ISSUE 3 ( September-December, 2018 ) > List of Articles

REVIEW ARTICLE

Ectopic Pregnancy: Laparoscopic Conservative Treatment and Laparoscopic Salpingotomy

Bassim Alsadi

Keywords : Ectopic pregnancy, Laparoscopy, Salpingectomy, Salpingotomy, Ultrasound

Citation Information : Alsadi B. Ectopic Pregnancy: Laparoscopic Conservative Treatment and Laparoscopic Salpingotomy. World J Lap Surg 2018; 11 (3):138-146.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10033-1347

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 01-12-2018

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2018; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.


Abstract

Objective: Whether a laparoscopic salpingostomy should be done or a salpingectomy for surgical treatment of ectopic pregnancy. Materials and methods: Literature examining and review the impact of recent advances in the diagnosis and laparoscopic conservative treatment of ectopic tubal pregnancy. Articles published in English language using the following search engines: Medline, Pubmed, Medscape, and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. Results: The choice of salpingostomy or salpingectomy relies upon many factors and includes shared decision-making between the surgeon and patient. Laparoscopic surgery remains the “gold standard” in majority of women. Conclusion: There is some evidence to suggest that future fertility outcomes are slightly improved after tubal conservation at surgery in comparison with salpingectomy. As the incidence of ectopic pregnancy continues to rise in a population that will likely desire future fertility, early diagnosis is key in facilitating safe utilization of more conservative management in the hope of preserving tubal function and reproductive potential.


PDF Share
  1. Gibbs R, Danforth D, et al. Danforth's Obstetrics and Gynecology. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2008.
  2. Trabert B, Holt VL, et al. Population-based ectopic pregnancy trends,1993–2007. Am J Prev Med 2011;40(5):556–560. DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2010.12.026.
  3. Bouyer J, Coste J, et al. Sites of ectopic pregnancy: a 10 year population-based study of 1,800 cases. Hum Reprod 2002;17(12):3224. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/17.12.3224.
  4. Goyaux N, Leke R, et al. Ectopic pregnancy in African developing countries. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2003;82:305–312. DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0412.2003.00175.x.
  5. Murray H, Baakdah H, et al. Diagnosis and treatment of ectopic pregnancy. CMAJ 2005;173(8):905. DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.050222.
  6. Dart RG, Kaplan B, et al. Predictive value of history and physical examination in patients with suspected ectopic pregnancy. Ann Emerg Med 1999;33(3):283–290. DOI: 10.1016/S0196-0644(99) 70364-1.
  7. Mol BW, Hajenius PJ, et al. Can noninvasive diagnostic tools predict tubal rupture or active bleeding in patients with tubal pregnancy? Fertil Steril 1999;71(1):167–173. DOI: 10.1016/S0015-0282(98) 00418-X.
  8. Mol BW, Hajenius PJ, et al. Should patients who are suspected of having an ectopic pregnancy undergo physical examination? Fertil Steril 1999;71(1):155–157. DOI: 10.1016/S0015-0282(98)00396-3.
  9. Casanova BC, Sammel MD, et al. Prediction of outcome in women with symptomatic first-trimester pregnancy: focus on intrauterine rather than ectopic gestation. J Womens Health (Larchmt) 2009;18(2):195. DOI: 10.1089/jwh.2008.0896.
  10. Job-Spira N, Fernandez H, et al. Ruptured tubal ectopic pregnancy: risk factors and reproductive outcome: results of a population-based study in France. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1999;180(4):938. DOI: 10.1016/S0002-9378(99)70665-4.
  11. Stovall TG, Kellerman AL, et al. Emergency department diagnosis of ectopic pregnancy. Ann Emerg Med 1990;19(10):1098. DOI: 10.1016/S0196-0644(05)81511-2.
  12. Kadar N, DeVore G, et al. Discriminatory hCG zone: its use in the sonographic evaluation for ectopic pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 1981;58(2):156–161.
  13. Cacciatore B, Sterman VH. Diagnosis of ectopic pregnancy by vaginal ultrasonography in combination with a discriminatory serum HCG level of 1000 IU/L. BJOG 1990;97(10):904–908. DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1990.tb02445.x.
  14. Counselman FL, Shaar GS, et al. Quantitative B-hCG levels less than 1000 mIU/mL in patients with ectopic pregnancy: pelvic ultrasound still useful. J Emerg Med 1998;16(5):699–703. DOI: 10.1016/S0736-4679(98)00081-X.
  15. Lavie O, Boldes R, et al. Ultrasonographic “endometrial three-layer” pattern: a unique finding in ectopic pregnancy. J Clin Ultrasound 1996;24(4):179–183. DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0096(199605)24:4<179::AID-JCU4>3.0.CO;2-C.
  16. Lopez HB, Micheelsen U, et al. Ectopic pregnancy and its associated endometrial changes. Gynecol Obstet Invest 1994;38:104. DOI: 10.1159/000292459.
  17. Hammoud AO, Hammoud I, et al. The role of sonographic endometrial patterns and endometrial thickness in the differential diagnosis of ectopic pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005 May;192(5):1370–1375. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2004.12.039.
  18. Kirk E, Papageorghiou AT, et al. The diagnostic effectiveness of an initial transvaginal scan in detecting ectopic pregnancy. Hum Reprod 2007;22(11):2824–2828. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dem283.
  19. van Mello NM, Mol F, et al. Ectopic pregnancy: how the diagnostic and therapeutic management has changed. Fertil Steril 2012;98(5): 1066–1073. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.09.040.
  20. Barnhart KT, Simhan H, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound above and below the beta-hCG discriminatory zone. Obstet Gynecol 1999;94:583–587. DOI: 10.1097/00006250-199910000-00018.
  21. Barnhart KT, Fay CA, et al. Clinical factors affecting the accuracy of ultrasonography in symptomatic first-trimester pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 2011;117(2 Pt 1):299–306. DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3182050ed0.
  22. Kirk E, Bourne T. Diagnosis of ectopic pregnancy with ultrasound. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2009;23(4):501–508. DOI: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2008.12.010.
  23. Bouyer J, Coste J, et al. Risk factors for ectopic regnancy: a comprehensive analysis based on a large case-control, population-based study in France. Am J Epidemiol 2003;157(3):185–194. DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwf190.
  24. Yao M, Tulandi T. Current status of surgical and nonsurgical management of ectopic pregnancy. Fertil Steril 1997;67(3):421–433. DOI: 10.1016/S0015-0282(97)80064-7.
  25. Khan KS, Wojdyla D, et al. WHO analysis of causes of maternal death: a systematic review. Lancet 2006;367(9516):1066–1074. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68397-9.
  26. Van Den Eeden SK, Shan J, et al. Ectopic pregnancy rate and treatment utilization in a large managed care organization. Obstet Gynecol 2005;105(5 Pt 1):1052–1057. DOI: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000158860.26939.2d.
  27. Ankum WM, Mol BW, et al. Risk factors for ectopic pregnancy: a meta-analysis. Fertil Steril 1996;65(6):1093–1099. DOI: 10.1016/S0015-0282(16)58320-4.
  28. Barnhart KT, Casanova B, et al. Prediction of location of a symptomatic early gestation based solely on clinical presentation. Obstet Gynecol 2008;112(6):1319–1326. DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31818eddcf.
  29. Mol BW, Lijmer JG, et al. The accuracy of single serum progesterone measurement in the diagnosis of ectopic pregnancy: a meta-analysis. Hum Reprod 1998;13(11):3220–3227. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/13.11.3220.
  30. Seeber BE, Barnhar KT. Suspect ectopic pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 2006;107(2 Pt 1):399–413. DOI: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000198632.15229.be.
  31. Condous G, Kirk E, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of varying discriminatory zones for the prediction of ectopic pregnancy in women with a pregnancy of unknown location. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2005;26(7):770. DOI: 10.1002/uog.2636.
  32. Attar E. Endocrinology of ectopic pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 2004;31(4):779. DOI: 10.1016/j.ogc.2004.08.011.
  33. Shaw JL, Wills GS, et al. Chlamydia trachomatis infection increases fallopian tube PROKR2 via TLR2 and NFκB activation resulting in a microenvironment predisposed to ectopic pregnancy. Am J Pathol 2011;178(1):253. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2010.11.019.
  34. Evidence-based management of ectopic pregnancy. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2000;12(4):289–292. DOI: 10.1097/00001703-200008000-00004.
  35. Ectopic pregnancy: an update. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2004;16(4):289–293. DOI: 10.1097/01.gco.0000136494.49334.6b.
  36. Iwama H, Tsutsumi S, et al. A case of retroperitoneal ectopic pregnancy following IVF-ET in a patient with previous bilateral salpingectomy. Am J Perinatol 2008;25(1):33–36. DOI: 10.1055/s-2007-1004829.
  37. Isaacs Jr JD, Cesare Sr CD, et al. Ectopic pregnancy following hysterectomy: an update for the 1990s. Obstet Gynecol 1996;88:732. DOI: 10.1016/0029-7844(96)00128-7.
  38. Alexander AR, Everidge GJ. Ectopic pregnancy following total vaginal hysterectomy. Obstet Gynecol 1979;53(Suppl 3):7S–8S.
  39. Binder DS. Thirteen-week abdominal pregnancy after hysterectomy. J Emerg Med 2003;25(2):159. DOI: 10.1016/S0736-4679(03) 00163-X.
  40. Fader AN, Mansuria S, et al. A 14-week abdominal pregnancy after total abdominal hysterectomy. Obstet Gynecol 2007;109(Suppl 2):519. DOI: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000243774.14606.64.
  41. Bassil S, Pouly JL, et al. Advanced heterotopic pregnancy after in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer, with survival of both the babies and the mother. Hum Reprod 1991;6(7):1008–1010. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a137450.
  42. Shapiro HI, Adler DH. Excision of an ectopic pregnancy through the laparoscope. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1973;117(2):290–291. DOI: 10.1016/0002-9378(73)90652-2.
  43. Bruhat MA, Manhes H, et al. Treatment of ectopic pregnancy by means of laparoscopy. Fertil Steril 1980;33(4):411–414. DOI: 10.1016/S0015-0282(16)44659-5.
  44. DeCherney AH, Maheaux R, et al. Salpingostomy for ectopic pregnancy in the sole patent oviduct: reproductive outcome. Fertil Steril 1982;37(5):619–622. DOI: 10.1016/S0015-0282(16)46271-0.
  45. Nezhat C, Siegler A, et al. Operative Gynecologic Laparoscopy: Principles and Techniques, 2nd ed., McGraw-Hill; 2000.
  46. Pouly JL, Chapron C, et al. Multifactorial analysis of fertility after conservative laparoscopic treatment of ectopic pregnancy in a series of 223 patients. Fertil Steril 1991;56(3):453–460. DOI: 10.1016/S0015-0282(16)54539-7.
  47. Murphy AA, Nager CW, et al. Operative laparoscopy vs laparotomy for the management of ectopic pregnancy. Fertil Steril 1992;57(6): 1180–1185. DOI: 10.1016/S0015-0282(16)55070-5.
  48. Vermesh M, Silva P, et al. Management of unruptured ectopic gestation by linear salpingostomy: a prospective, randomized clinical trial of laparoscopy vs laparotomy. Obstet Gynecol 1989;73: 400–404.
  49. Lundorff P, Thorburn J, et al. Laparoscopic surgery in ectopic pregnancy: a randomized trial vs laparoscopy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1991;70(4–5):343–348. DOI: 10.3109/00016349109007885.
  50. Lundorff P, Thorburn J, et al. Fertility outcome after conservative surgical treatment of ectopic pregnancy evaluated in a randomized trial. Fertil Steril 1992;57(5):998–1002. DOI: 10.1016/S0015-0282(16) 55015-8.
  51. Gray D, Thorburn J, et al. A. cost-effectiveness study of a randomised trial of laparoscopy vs laparotomy for ectopic pregnancy. Lancet 1995;345 (8958):1139–1143. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(95)90977-X.
  52. Seifer DB, Gutman JN, et al. Persistent ectopic pregnancy following laparoscopic linear salpingostomy. Obstet Gynecol 1990;76(6): 1121–1125.
  53. Hajenius PJ, Mol BWJ, et al. Clearance curves of serum human chorionic gonadotrophin for the diagnosis of persistent trophoblast. Hum Reprod 1995;10(3):683–687. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a136012.
  54. Spandorfer SD, Sawin SW, et al. Postoperative day 1 serum human chorionic gonadotropin level as a predictor of persistent ectopic pregnancy after conservative surgical management. Fertil Steril 1997;68(3):430–434. DOI: 10.1016/s0015-0282(97)00253-7.
  55. Mol F, van Mello NM, et al. Salpingotomy vs salpingectomy in women with tubal pregnancy (ESEP study): an open-label, multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2014;383(9927):1483. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60123-9.
  56. Fernandez H, Capmas P, et al. Fertility after ectopic pregnancy: the DEMETER randomized trial. Hum Reprod 2013;28(5):1247. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/det037.
  57. de Bennetot M, Rabischong B, et al. Fertility after tubal ectopic pregnancy: results of a population-based study. Fertil Steril 2012;98(5):1271–1276. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.06.041.
  58. Ego A, Subtil D, et al. Survival analysis of fertility after ectopic pregnancy. Fertil Steril 2001;75(3):560–566. DOI: 10.1016/S0015-0282(00)01761-1.
  59. Becker S, Solomayer E, et al. Optimal treatment for patients with ectopic pregnancies and a history of fertility-reducing factors. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2011;283(1):41–46. DOI: 10.1007/s00404-009-1270-2.
  60. Sowter M, Frappell J. The role of laparoscopy in the management of ectopic pregnancy. Rev Gynaecol Practice 2002;2(1–2):73–82. DOI: 10.1016/S1471-7697(02)00007-2.
  61. Lundorff P, Hahlin M, et al. Persistent trophoblast after conservative treatment of ectopic pregnancy: prediction and detection. Obstet Gynecol 1991;77(1):129–133.
  62. Kemmann E, Trout S, et al. Can we predict patients at risk for persistent ectopic pregnancy after laparoscopic salpingotomy? J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 1994;1(2):122–126. DOI: 10.1016/S1074-3804(05)80774-1.
  63. Bruhat M, Manhes H, et al. Experimental laparoscopic treatment of ectopic pregnancy. Rev Fr Gynecol Obstet 1977;72:667–674.
  64. Mage G, Manhes H, et al. Methods and results of treatment by laparoscopy of tubal pregnancy. A report on 78 cases. Gynecologie 1980;31:157–161.
  65. Manhès H, Mage G, et al. Améliorations techniques du traitement coelioscopiques de la grossesse extra-utérine. Nouv Presse Med 1983;12:1431–1433.
  66. Sherman D, Langer R, et al. Improved fertility following ectopic pregnancy. Fertil Steril 1982;37(4):497–502. DOI: 10.1016/S0015-0282(16)46155-8.
  67. Pouly JL, Mahnes H, et al. Conservative laparoscopic treatment of 321 ectopic pregnancies. Fertil Steril 1986;46(6):1093–1097. DOI: 10.1016/S0015-0282(16)49886-9.
  68. Bangsgaard N, Lund CO, et al. Improved fertility following conservative surgical treatment of ectopic pregnancy. BJOG 2003;110(8):765–770. DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2003.02253.x.
  69. Rabischong B, Larraín D, et al. Predicting Success of laparoscopic salpingostomy for ectopic pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 2010;116(3): 701–707. DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181eeb80f.
  70. DeCherney AH, Diamond MP. Laparoscopic salpingostomy for ectopic pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 1987;70(6):948–950.
  71. Courdier S, Garbin O, et al. Equipment failure: causes and consequences in endoscopic gynecologic surgery. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2009;16(1):28–33. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2008.08.019.
  72. Stock RJ. Persistent tubal pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 1991;77:267–270. DOI: 10.1097/00006250-199102000-00021.
  73. Chapron C, Querleu D, et al. Laparoscopic treatment of ectopic pregnancies: a one hundred cases study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1991;41(3):187–190. DOI: 10.1016/0028-2243(91)90022-D.
  74. Donnez J, et al. Atlas of Operative Laparoscopy and Hysteroscopy. Informa; 2007.
  75. Tulandi T, Guralnick M. Treatment of tubal ectopic pregnancy by salpingotomy with or without tubal suturing and salpingectomy. Fertil Steril 1991;55(1):53–55. DOI: 10.1016/S0015-0282(16)54058-8.
  76. Fujishita A, Masuzaki H, et al. Laparoscopic salpingotomy for tubal pregnancy:comparison of linear salpingotomy with and without suturing. Hum Reprod 2004;19(5):1195–1200. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deh196.
  77. Berek JS, Crum C, et al. Cancer of the ovary, fallopian tube, and peritoneum. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2012;119(Suppl 2):S118. DOI: 10.1016/S0020-7292(12)60025-3.
  78. Kindelberger DW, Lee Y, et al. Intraepithelial carcinoma of the fimbria and pelvic serous carcinoma: evidence for a causal relationship. Am J Surg Pathol 2007;31(2):161. DOI: 10.1097/01.pas.0000213335. 40358.47.
  79. Seidman JD, Zhao P, et al. “Primary peritoneal” high-grade serous carcinoma is very likely metastatic from serous tubal intraepithelial carcinoma: assessing the new paradigm of ovarian and pelvic serous carcinogenesis and its implications for screening for ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2011;120(3):470. DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2010.11.020.
  80. Salvador S, Gilks B, et al. The fallopian tube: primary site of most pelvic high-grade serous carcinomas. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2009;19(1):58. DOI: 10.1111/IGC.0b013e318199009c.
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.