World Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery

Register      Login

VOLUME 12 , ISSUE 1 ( January-April, 2019 ) > List of Articles

Original Article

Follow-up Study Comparing Open Hysterectomy of Expert Surgeon and Laparoscopic Approach (Learning Curve) of the Same Surgeon

Maliheh Arab, Jatinder Sigh Chowhan, Shahla N Ardebili, Behnaz Ghavami, Nasrin Yousefi

Keywords : Complications, Hysterectomy, Laparoscopy, Laparotomy, Learning curve

Citation Information : Arab M, Chowhan JS, Ardebili SN, Ghavami B, Yousefi N. Follow-up Study Comparing Open Hysterectomy of Expert Surgeon and Laparoscopic Approach (Learning Curve) of the Same Surgeon. World J Lap Surg 2019; 12 (1):5-8.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10033-1359

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 01-06-2018

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2019; The Author(s).


Introduction: The goal of minimal access surgery is to minimize damage to the patient without impairment of immunity and the effect of treatment compared to traditional open surgical techniques. Laparoscopic hysterectomy requires more surgical skills and the learning curve is steep. The goal of this study is to compare hysterectomy in learning curve (including about 50 first surgeries) with open hysterectomy of the same surgeon, expert in open surgery, for complications, hospital stay duration, transfusion, operative time, and readmission. Materials and methods: In a prospective cohort study, patients undergoing hysterectomy at an academic medical center located in Tehran were randomly assigned into laparoscopic (in learning curve) and laparotomy groups from 2016 to 2018. Study cases data were recorded regarding complications, hospital stay, operative time, and blood transfusion. Results: There was no significant difference regarding intra- and postoperative transfusion, hospital stay duration, postoperative complications, and readmission in laparoscopy and laparotomy groups of hysterectomy. However, operative time was significantly different in laparoscopy and laparotomy subgroups of hysterectomy and longer in the laparoscopic group (277 minutes in laparoscopy vs 196 minutes in laparotomy). Conclusion: This study encourages starting laparoscopy method instead of open surgery, even in the setting of expert open surgeons, and even in the advanced (level 4) surgery such as hysterectomy.

  1. Mishra RK. Text book of Practical Laparoscopic Surgery. In: Mishra RK. ed. Chronological Advances in Minimal Access Surgery, 3rd ed., New Delhi: Jaypee Brothers Medical Publisher (P) Ltd; 2013. pp. 3–7.
  2. Hurd W, Rivlin ME. Gynecologic Laparoscopy. Sep 12, 2018.
  3. Gunning JE. The history of laparoscopy. J Reprod Med 1974;12: 222–225.
  4. Mán E, Németh T, et al. Learning curve after rapid introduction of laparoscopic appendectomy: are there any risks in surgical resident participation? World J Emerg Surg 2016. DOI: 10.1186/s13017-016-0074-5.
  5. Raja RJ. The Impact of the Learning Curve in Laparoscopic Surgery. World J Laparoscopic Surg 2008;1(1):56–59. DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10007-1048.
  6. Terzi H, Biler A, et al. Total laparoscopic hysterectomy: Analysis of the surgical learning curve in benign conditions. Int J Surg November 2016;35:51–57. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2016.09.010.
  7. Perino A, Cucinella G, et al. Total laparoscopic hysterectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy: an assessment of the learning curve in a prospective randomized study. Human Reprod 1999;14:2996–2999. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/14.12.2996.
  8. Lirk P, Thiry J, et al. Pain management after laparoscopic hysterectomy: systematic review of literature and PROSPECT recommendations. BMJ Feb 2019. DOI: 10.1136/rapm-2018-100024.
  9. Chapron C, Dubuisson JB, et al. Total laparoscopic hysterectomy: preliminary results. Hum Reprod 1994;9:2084–2089. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a138398.
  10. Chapron C, Fauconnier A, et al. Laparoscopic surgery is not inherently dangerous for patients presenting with benign gynaecologic pathology. Results of a meta-analysis. Hum Reprod 2002;17: 1334–1342. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/17.5.1334.
  12. Mishra RK. Text book of Practical Laparoscopic Surgery. In: Mishra RK. ed. Role of Training in Minimal Access Surgery, 3rd ed., New Delhi: Jaypee Brothers Medical Publisher (P) Ltd; 2013. pp. 532–539.
  13. Papachristofi O, Jenkins D, et al. Assessment of learning curves in complex surgical interventions: a consecutive case-series study. BMS Series June 2016. DOI: 10.1186/s13063-016-1383-4.
  14. Michel LA. Epistelogy of evidence-based medicine. Surg Endosc 2007;21(2):146. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-006-0905-7.
  15. Verdaasdonk EGG, Stassen LPS, et al. Problems with technical equipment during laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 2007;21: 275–279. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-006-0019-2.
  16. Mavrona R, Radosa JC, et al. Learning curves for laparoscopic hysterectomy after implementation of minimally invasive surgery. Researchgate May 2016.
  17. Bozkurt N, Yildiz S, et al. Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy: Learning Curve of a Single Surgeon with 40 Cases. The journal of minimally invasive Gynecology. November–December, 2013;20(6):S150.
  18. Graves N, Janda M, et al. The cost-effectiveness of total laparoscopic hysterectomy compared to total abdominal hysterectomy for the treatment of early stage endometrial cancer. J Health Econ 2012.
  19. Marana R, Busacca M, et al. Laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy: a prospective, randomized, multicenter study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1999;180: 270–275. DOI: 10.1016/S0002-9378(99)70199-7.
  20. MacKoul P, Danilyants N, et al. Laparoscopic Hysterectomy Outcomes: Hospital vs Ambulatory Surgery Center. JSLS 2019 Jan–Mar;23(1):e2018.00076. DOI: 10.4293/JSLS.2018.00076.
  21. Torng PL, Pan SP, et al. Learning curve in concurrent application of laparoscopic and robotic-assisted hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy in endometrial cancer. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol December 2017;56(6):781–787. DOI: 10.1016/j.tjog.2017.10.014.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.