Introduction: Intrauterine contraceptive device (IUCD) migration consequent to perforation of the uterus is not very common, but is one of the more serious complications. Case descriptions: We described two cases of migrated IUCD, at two distinct sites in the pelvic cavity, one was located in the pouch of Douglas embedded behind the left ovary and tube which was adherent to the posterior uterine wall and another was in the left mesovarium between the ovary and the tube. Both IUCDs were successfully removed laparoscopically without any complication. Conclusion: Migrated IUCDs should always be removed once the diagnosis is made to prevent serious complications. Laparoscopic approach is a successful and preferred choice of treatment in selected cases.
Bozkurt M, Yumru AE, Coskun EI, et al. Laparoscopic management of a translocated intrauterine device embedded in the gastric serosa. J Pak Med Assoc 2011;61(10):1020–1022.
Ingec M, Kumtepe Y, Kadanali S, et al. A rare case of ileal embedding by an intrauterine device. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care 2005;10(1):29–31. DOI: 10.1080/13625180500035082.
Chi I. What have we learned from recent IUD studies: a researcher's perspective. Contraception 1993;48(2):81–108. DOI: 10.1016/0010-7824(93)90001-N.
Heartwell SF, Schlesselman S. Risk of uterine perforation among users of intrauterine devices. Obstet Gynecol 1983;61(1):31–36.
Aydogdu O, Pulat H. Asymptomatic far-migration of an intrauterine device into the abdominal cavity: a rare entity. CUAJ 2012;6(3): E134–E136. DOI: 10.5489/cuaj.11100.
Stuckey A, Dutreil P, Aspuru E, et al. Symptomatic cecal perforation by an intrauterine device with appendectomy removal. Obstet Gynecol 2005;105(5 Pt 2):1239–1241. DOI: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000157760.59342.bc.
Gill RS, Mok D, Hudson M, et al. Laparoscopic removal of an intra-abdominal intrauterine device: case and systematic review. Contraception 2012;85(1):15–18. DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception. 2011.04.015.
Gungor M, Sonmezer M, Atabekoglu C, et al. Laparoscopic management of a translocated intrauterine device perforating the bowel. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 2003;10(4):539–541. DOI: 10.1016/S1074-3804(05)60163-6.
Zeino MY, Wietfeldt ED, Advani V, et al. Laparoscopic removal of a copper intrauterine device from the sigmoid colon. JSLS 2011;15(4):568–570. DOI: 10.4293/108680811X13176785204661.
Mederos R, Humaran L, Minervini D. Surgical removal of an intrauterine device perforating the sigmoid colon: a case report. Int J Surg 2008;6(6):e60–e62. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2007.02.006.
Sepulveda WH, Ciuffardi I, Olivari A, et al. Sonographic diagnosis of bladder perforation by an intrauterine device. A case report. J Reprod Med 1993;38(11):911–913.
Dede FS, Dilbaz B, Sahin D, et al. Vesical calculus formation around a migrated copper-T 380-A. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care 2006;11(1):50–52. DOI: 10.1080/13625180500389349.
Ozgun MT, Batukan C, Serin IS, et al. Surgical management of intra-abdominal mislocated intrauterine devices. Contraception 2007;75(2):96–100. DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2006.09.011.
Roy KK, Banerjee N, Sinha A. Laparoscopic removal of translocated retroperitoneal IUD. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2000;71(3):241–243. DOI: 10.1016/S0020-7292(00)00213-7.