World Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery

Register      Login

VOLUME 13 , ISSUE 2 ( May-August, 2020 ) > List of Articles

COMMENTARY

A Surgery on Deep Infiltrating Endometriosis Involving the Rectum: A Debate Started 100 Years Ago between Cullen and Sampson

John L Yovich

Keywords : Adenomyosis, Advanced laparoscopic surgery, Bowel resection, Deep infiltrating endometriosis involving rectum DIER, Endometriosis

Citation Information : Yovich JL. A Surgery on Deep Infiltrating Endometriosis Involving the Rectum: A Debate Started 100 Years Ago between Cullen and Sampson. World J Lap Surg 2020; 13 (2):94-96.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10033-1400

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 01-08-2020

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2020; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.


Abstract

A recent randomized control trial reports at the 5 years postoperative stage for limited vs extended surgery involving the rectovaginal septum. For those gynecologists with advanced laparoscopy skills who have been reluctant to embrace the idea of complete bowel resections with reanastomosis, the study provides comfort in showing no difference in long-term outcomes between nodule excision and rectal resection. However, the study perpetuates the idea that all medical procedures have to be subjected to this type of statistical analysis, without any reference to the pioneers whose ideas formed the basis of current procedures as well as providing an understanding of the pathogenesis of the underlying disorder. The two gynecologists who first reported on the surgical management of this condition 100 years ago projected different ideas on pathogenesis as well as the appropriate surgical method to apply. Thomas Cullen and John Sampson should be acknowledged in any consideration of determining the appropriate procedure for this challenging disorder.


PDF Share
  1. Roman H, Tuech JJ, Huet E, et al. Excision vs colorectal resection in deep endometriosis infiltrating the rectum: 5 year follow-up of patients enrolled in a randomised controlled trial. Hum Reprod 2019;34(12):2362–2371. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dez217.
  2. Cullen TS. Adenomyoma of the Uterus. Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders; 1908. p. 294.
  3. Cullen TS. Adenomyoma of the rectovaginal septum. JAMA 1914;62:835–839. DOI: 10.1001/jama.1914.02560360015006.
  4. Cullen TS. Adenoma of the recto-vaginal septum. JAMA 1916;67: 401–406. DOI: 10.1001/jama.1916.02590060001001.
  5. Cullen TS. The distribution of adenomyomas containing uterine mucosa. Arch Surg 1920;1(2):215–283. DOI: 10.1001/archsurg.1920.01110020002001.
  6. Yovich JL. The history of endometriosis preceding Sampson. Med J Obstet Gynecol 2020;8(1):1131, 1–8.
  7. Yovich JL, Rowlands PK, Lingham S, et al. Advanced fibroid study: paying homage to john Sampson. Reprod Biomed Online 2019;39(2):183–186. DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2019.04.013.
  8. Yovich JL, Rowlands PK, Lingham S, et al. Pathogenesis of endometriosis: look no further than john Sampson. Reprod Biomed Online 2020;40(1):7–11. DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2019. 10.007.
  9. Yovich JL. Understanding endometriosis: clarifying Sampson's theories with a personal perspective. Med J Obstet Gynecol 2020;8(1):1130, 1–12.
  10. Canis M, Mage G, Manhes H, et al. Laparoscopic treatment of endometriosis. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1989;68(S150):15–20. DOI: 10.1111/aogs.1989.68.s150.15.
  11. Afors K, Centini G, Fernandes R, et al. Segmental and discoid resection are preferential to bowel shaving for medium-term symptomatic relief in patients with bowel endometriosis. JMIG 2016;23(7): 1123–1129. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2016.08.813.
  12. Donnez J. Endometriosis: enigmatic in the pathogenesis and controversial in its therapy. Fertil Steril 2012;98(3):509–510. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.07.1125.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.