World Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery

Register      Login

VOLUME 14 , ISSUE 3 ( September-December, 2021 ) > List of Articles


Laparoscopic Extended Hemicolectomy vs Laparoscopic Transverse Colectomy for Management of Mid-transverse Colon Cancer—Which is the Optimal Surgical Approach?

Abdelwahab S Almoregy, Gamal Osman, Mahmoud Sharafedeen, Ahmed Z Alattar

Keywords : Hemicolectomy, Laparoscopic, Mid-transverse colon cancer, Transverse colectomy

Citation Information : Almoregy AS, Osman G, Sharafedeen M, Alattar AZ. Laparoscopic Extended Hemicolectomy vs Laparoscopic Transverse Colectomy for Management of Mid-transverse Colon Cancer—Which is the Optimal Surgical Approach?. World J Lap Surg 2021; 14 (3):215-220.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10033-1478

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 05-03-2022

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2021; The Author(s).


Background: Laparoscopic-assisted surgical approach performing either extended right or left hemicolectomy or performing only conservative approach by transverse colectomy could be considered as various management approaches of cancer of the transverse colon but a consensus of which technique is the best is still lacking. So the choice of surgical approach depends on the preference and experience of the operating surgeon. Aim: The aim of this study was to compare performing laparoscopic extended right or left hemicolectomy and performing transverse colectomy for management of transverse colon cancer located in the middle part of the transverse colon regarding surgical and oncological findings and patients’ outcomes to prove which surgical approach is the best. Patients and methods: We analyzed collected data of 120 patients with mid-transverse colon cancer. We divided them into two groups: the first group included 80 patients who were managed by right or left hemicolectomy and the second group included 40 patients who were managed by transverse colectomy. We evaluated operative, postoperative, and follow-up data of all included patients. Results: The length of specimens was longer in the hemicolectomy group than that in the transverse colectomy group (p = 0.007). The numbers of dissected lymph nodes were significantly higher in the hemicolectomy group than in the transverse colectomy group (p <0.001). The duration of operative time was longer in the hemicolectomy group than in the transverse colectomy group (p = 0.014). The group of patients in the hemicolectomy group experienced a higher rate of recovery findings than the transverse colectomy group. The group of patients in the hemicolectomy group experienced lower rates of intraoperative and perioperative complications than the transverse colectomy group (p = 0.002). Five years of overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and disease-free survival (DFS) rates were slightly longer in the hemicolectomy groups than those in the transverse colectomy group, but results were not statistically significant. Conclusion: We concluded that hemicolectomy is a better surgical approach of management of cancer located in the mid-transverse colon regarding operative and short-term outcomes than transverse colectomy, but regarding oncological outcomes, both techniques are considered safe and feasible.

  1. Milone M, Degiuli M, Allaix ME, et al. Midtransverse colon cancer and extended versus transverse colectomy: results of the Italian society of surgical oncology colorectal cancer network (SICO CCN) multicenter collaborative study, Eur J Surg Oncol 2020;46(9):1683–1688. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2020.01.006.
  2. Sjo OH, Lunde OC, Nygaard K, et al. Tumour location is a prognostic factor for survival in colonic cancer patients. Colorectal Dis 2008;10(1):33–40. DOI: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2007.01302.x.
  3. Chong CS, Huh JW, Oh BY, et al. Operative method for transverse colon carcinoma. Dis Colon Rectum 2016;59(7):630–639. DOI: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000619.
  4. Matsuda T, Sumi Y, Yamashita K, et al. Optimal surgery for mid-transverse colon cancer: laparoscopic extended right hemicolectomy versus laparoscopic transverse colectomy. World J Surg 2018;42(10):3398–3404. DOI: 10.1007/s00268-018-4612-z.
  5. Matsuda T, Iwasaki T, Sumi Y, et al. Laparoscopic complete mesocolic excision for right-sided colon cancer using a cranial approach: anatomical and embryological consideration. Int J Colorectal Dis 2017;32(1):139–141. DOI: 10.1007/s00384-016-2673-8.
  6. Wray CM, Ziogas A, Hinojosa MW, et al. Tumor subsite location within the colon is prognostic for survival after colon cancer diagnosis. Dis Colon Rectum 2009;52(8):1359–1366. DOI: 10.1007/DCR.0b013e3181a7b7de.
  7. Kim MK, Won D-Y, Lee J-K, et al. Laparoscopic surgery for transverse colon cancer: shortand long-term outcomes in comparison with conventional open surgery. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech 2015;25(12):982–989. DOI: 10.1089/lap.2015.0122.
  8. Kim CW, Shin US, Yu CS, et al. Clinicopathologic characteristics, surgical treatment and outcomes for splenic flexure colon cancer. Cancer Res Treat 2010;42(2):69–76. DOI: 10.4143/crt.2010.42.2.69.
  9. Milone M, Manigrasso M, Burati M, et al. Surgical resection for rectal cancer. Is laparoscopic surgery as successful as open approach? A systematic review with meta-analysis. PLoS One 2018;13(10):e0204887. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0204887.
  10. Milone M, Elmore U, Vignali A, et al. Recovery after intracorporeal anastomosis in laparoscopic right hemicolectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2018;403(1): 1–10. DOI: 10.1007/s00423-017-1645-y.
  11. Athanasiou CD, Robinson J, Yiasemidou M, et al. Laparoscopic vs open approach for transverse colon cancer. A systematic review and meta-analysis of short and long term outcomes. Int J Surg (Lond Engl) 2017;41:78–85. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2017.03.050.
  12. Kim MK, Lee IK, Kang WK, et al. Long-term oncologic outcomes of laparoscopic surgery for splenic flexure colon cancer are comparable to conventional open surgery. Ann Surg Treat Res 2017;93(1): 35–42. DOI: 10.4174/astr.2017.93.1.35.
  13. Leijssen LGJ, Dinaux AM, Amri R, et al. A transverse colectomy is as safe as an extended right or left colectomy for mid-transverse colon cancer. World J Surg 2018;42(10):3381–3389. DOI: 10.1007/s00268-018-4582-1.
  14. van Rongen I, Damhuis RAM, van der Hoeven JAB, et al. Comparison of extended hemicolectomy versus transverse colectomy in patients with cancer of the transverse colon. Acta Chir Belg 2013;113(2):107–111. PMID: 23741929.
  15. Guan X, Zhao Z, Yang M, et al. Whether partial colectomy is oncologically safe for patients with transverse colon cancer: a large population-based study. Oncotarget 2017;8(54):93236–93244. DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.21275.
  16. Milone M, Manigrasso M, Elmore U, et al. Short- and long-term outcomes after transverse versus extended colectomy for transverse colon cancer. A systematic review and metaanalysis. Int J Colorectal Dis 2019;34(2):201–207. DOI: 10.1007/s00384-018-3186-4.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.