World Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery

Register      Login

VOLUME 15 , ISSUE 1 ( January-April, 2022 ) > List of Articles

ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Laparoscopic vs Open Appendectomy: Comparison on Clinical Outcome

Ahmed Salim Khazaal

Keywords : Appendicitis, Hospital stay, Laparoscopic appendectomy

Citation Information : Khazaal AS. Laparoscopic vs Open Appendectomy: Comparison on Clinical Outcome. World J Lap Surg 2022; 15 (1):54-57.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10033-1484

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 09-05-2022

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2022; The Author(s).


Abstract

Aim: In the past years, studies have reported the superiority of laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) over open appendectomy (OA) in randomized studies. Hence, this prospective study was designed to evaluate the clinical outcome of LA compared to the OA. Methods: All the patients who were diagnosed with appendicitis and visited Tikrit Teaching Hospital in the study period were included in this study. They were divided into two groups: LA and OA groups. The two groups were compared on operating time, hospital stay, the incidence of surgical site infection, and other postsurgical complications. Results: In the present study, a total of 128 patients (who visited Tikrit Teaching Hospital in Iraq) were included. Among them, 63 were included in the LA group and 65 people were in the OA group. The only significant difference that was observed in LA and OA group was in CRP count. In the OA group, the CRP count was significantly higher compared to the LA group (p = 0.024). The mean operating time was almost comparable between the LA and OA group. Blood loss was higher in the OA group and the difference was statistically significant (p = 0.038). Even hospital stay was also shown to be statistically higher in the OA group. A significant difference was reported in the wound infection among the LA and OA groups. In the OA group, wound infection was significantly higher (10.75%) than in the LA group (3.17%). No other adverse events were reported to be statistically different. Conclusion: Our findings revealed that LA has many advantages over OA, including a shorter hospital stay, earlier return to work, and a lower risk of wound infection. Clinical significance: LA significantly reduces postoperative complications and improves the surgical outcome.


PDF Share
  1. Kurtz RJ, Heimann TM. Comparison of open and laparoscopic treatment of acute appendicitis. Am J Surg 2001;182(3):211–214. DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9610(01)00694-8.
  2. Guller U, Hervey S, Purves H, et al. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: outcomes comparison based on a large administrative database. Ann Surg 2004;239(1):43. DOI: 10.1097/01.sla.0000103071.35986.c1.
  3. Shaikh AR, Sangrasi AK, Shaikh GA. Clinical outcomes of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy. JSLS 2009;13(4):574–580. DOI: 10.4293/108680809X1258998404524.
  4. Hellberg A, Rudberg C, Kullman E, et al. Prospective randomized multicentre study of laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy. Br J Surg 1999;86(1):48–53. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2168.1999.00971.x.
  5. Ortega AE, Hunter JG, Peters JH, et al. A prospective, randomized comparison of laparoscopic appendectomy with open appendectomy. Laparoscopic Appendectomy Study Group. Am J Surg 1995;169(2):208–212; discussion 212–213.
  6. Heikkinen TJ, Haukipuro K, Hulkko A. Cost-effective appendectomy. Open or laparoscopic? A prospective randomized study. Surg Endosc 1998;12(10):1204–1208. DOI: 10.1007/s004649900821.
  7. McCahill LE, Pellegrini CA, Wiggins T, et al. A clinical outcome and cost analysis of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy. Am J Surg 1996;171(5):533–537. DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9610(96)00022-0.
  8. Katkhouda N, Mason RJ, Towfigh S, et al. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: a prospective randomized double-blind study. Ann Surg 2005;242(3):439–448; discussion 448-450. DOI: 10.1097/01.sla.0000179648.75373.2f.
  9. Shimoda M, Maruyama T, Nishida K, et al. Comparison of clinical outcome of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy, single-center experience. Heliyon 2018;4:e00635. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2018.e00635.
  10. Bhangu A, Søreide K, Di Saverio S, et al. Acute appendicitis: modern understanding of pathogenesis, diagnosis, and management. Lancet 2015;386(10000):1278–1287. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00275-5.
  11. Biondi A, Stefano CD, Ferrara F, et al. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: a retrospective cohort study assessing outcomes and cost-effectiveness. World J Emerg Surg 2016;11(1):44. DOI: 10.1186/s13017-016-0102-5.
  12. Li X, Zhang J, Sang L, et al. Laparoscopic versus conventional appendectomy–a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. BMC Gastroenterol 2010;10:129. DOI: 10.1186/1471-230X-10-129.
  13. Wei B, Qi CL, Chen TF, et al. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for acute appendicitis: a metaanalysis. Surg Endosc 2011;25(4):1199–1208. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-010-1344-z.
  14. Shimizu T, Ishizuka M, Kubota K. The preoperative serum C-reactive protein level is a useful predictor of surgical site infections in patients undergoing appendectomy. Surg Today 2015;45(11):1404–1410. DOI: 10.1007/s00595-014-1086-y.
  15. Ingraham AM, Cohen ME, Bilimoria KY, et al. Comparison of outcomes after laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for acute appendicitis at 222 ACS NSQIP hospitals. Surgery 2010;148(4):625–635 [discussion 635–637]. DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2010.07.025.
  16. Frazee RC, Roberts JW, Symmonds RE, et al. A prospective randomized trial comparing open versus laparoscopic appendectomy. Ann Surg 1994;219(6):725–728 [discussion 728–731]. DOI: 10.1097/00000658-199406000-00017.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.