World Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery

Register      Login

VOLUME 15 , ISSUE 1 ( January-April, 2022 ) > List of Articles

Original Article

Study of Difficult Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy and Its Outcome According to Peroperative Scoring System

Keyur N Surati, Ronak Modi, Sourabh Damani, Aneri Shah, Monil Patel

Keywords : Cholecystitis, Degree of difficulty, Laparoscopic cholecystectomy, Severity grading

Citation Information : Surati K N, Modi R, Damani S, Shah A, Patel M. Study of Difficult Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy and Its Outcome According to Peroperative Scoring System. World J Lap Surg 2022; 15 (1):11-13.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10033-1485

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 13-06-2022

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2022; The Author(s).


Aims: To study comparison of peroperative finding in difficult cholecystectomy with a scoring system, to evaluate the amount of complexity in the surgery and its outcome. Materials and methods: A study of 50 patients undergoing elective difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomy was done. In difficult cholecystectomy, peroperative scoring was carried out, and based on these findings evaluation of the amount of complexity and results of the surgery was assessed according to the scoring system. Results: Patients with chronic calculous cholecystitis were 16 and degree of difficulty had an average score of 5 while of acute calculous cholecystitis were 28 patients with an average score of 6 and mucocele of gall bladder were 3 cases with an average score of 7. Two cases of empyema gall bladder and one case of gangrenous gall bladder both with an average score of 8. All extreme difficulty cases with a score of 8 were converted to open. Increased severity of score is proportional to the increased complexity of the surgery. Conversion to open surgery is indicated in an extreme degree of difficulty with a score of 8. Conclusion: This intraoperative scoring system is important in the evaluation of the complexity of cholecystectomy surgery and evaluating the amount of complexity in carrying out laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Clinical significance: In mild, moderate, and severe degrees of difficult cholecystectomy according to the peroperative scoring system (5–7), can be completed laparoscopically without complication. In extreme level difficult cholecystectomy, peroperative scoring system (≥8) can guide us to make the decision to convert it into open surgery and also help in preventing life-threatening complications like bile duct injury.

  1. Murphy JB. The diagnosis of gallstones. Am Med News 1903:825–833.
  2. Litynski GS. Erich Mühe and the rejection of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (1985): a surgeon ahead of his time. Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons 1998;2(4):341–346. PMID: 10036125.
  3. Sugrue M, Sahebally SM, Ansaloni L, et al. Grading operative findings at laparoscopic cholecystectomy–a new scoring system. World J Emerg Surg 2015;10:14. DOI: 10.1186/s13017-015-0005-x.
  4. Solmaz A, Gülçiçek OB, Biricik A, et al. Evaluation of the parameters increasing intraoperative difficulty scores of elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Liver Clin Res 2016;3(1):1023.
  5. Gutt CN, Encke J, Koninger J, et al. Acute cholecystitis: early versus delayed cholecystectomy, a multicenter randomized trial (ACDC study, NCT00447304). Ann Surg 2013;258(3):385–393. DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182a1599b.
  6. Takada T, Strasberg SM, Solomkin JS, et al. TG13: Updated Tokyo Guidelines for the management of acute cholangitis and cholecystitis. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 2013;20(1):1–7. DOI: 10.1007/s00534-012-0566-y.
  7. Committee AT, Adler DG, Conway JD, et al. Biliary and pancreatic stone extraction devices. Gastrointest Endosc 2009;70(4):603–609. DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2009.06.015.
  8. Pitt HA. Patient value is superior with early surgery for acute cholecystitis. Ann Surg 2014;259:16–17. DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000428.
  9. Gupta N, Ranjan G, Arora MP, et al. Validation of a scoring system to predict difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Int J Surg 2013;11(9):1002–1006. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2013.05.037.
  10. Vivek MA, Augustine AJ, Rao R. A comprehensive predictive scoring method for difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Minim Access Surg 2014;10(2):62–67. DOI: 10.4103/0972-9941.129947.
  11. Surati K, Rathod A, Shah AS. Intraoperative assessment of laparoscopic cholecystectomy, 2019.
  12. Okamoto S, Nakano K, Kosahara K, et al. Effects of pravastatin and ursodeoxycholic acid on cholesterol and bile acid metabolism in patients with cholesterol gallstones. J Gastroenterol 1994;29(1):47–55. DOI: 10.1007/BF01229073.
  13. Lal P, Agarwal PN, Malik VK, et al. A difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomy that requires conversion to open procedure can be predicted by peroperative ultrasonography. Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons 2002;6(1):59–63. PMID: 12002299.
  14. Khan IA, El-Tinay OE. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: can peroperative factors predict conversion? Saudi Med J 2004;25(3):299–302. PMID: 15048165.
  15. Gupta G, Sharma PK, Gupta S, et al. Pre and per operative prediction of difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomy using clinical and ultrasonographic parameters. Int J Res Med Sci 2015;3(11):3342–3346. DOI: 10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20151188.
  16. Peters JH, Krailadsiri W, Incarbone R, et al. Reasons for conversion from laparoscopic to open cholecystectomy in an urban teaching hospital. Am J Surg 1994;168(6):555–558. DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9610(05)80121-7.
  17. Kwon YJ, Ahn BK, Park HK, et al. What is the optimal time for laparoscopic cholecystectomy in gallbladder empyema? Surg Endosc 2013;27:3776–3780. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-013-2968-6.
  18. Pisano M, Ceresoli M, Campanati L, et al. Should We must push for primary surgery attempt in case of acute cholecystitis? A retrospective analysis and a proposal of an evidence based clinical pathway. Emerg Med 2014;4(4):201.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.