World Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery

Register      Login

VOLUME 16 , ISSUE 2 ( May-August, 2023 ) > List of Articles

Original Article

Evaluative Study of Outcome of Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

Kalpit Rameshchandra Suthar, Pratik Harshvadan Vyas, Nilesh Jayantilal Patel, Sameer Govindbhai Parikh, Gaurav Kanjibhai Solanki

Keywords : Cholecystectomy, Evaluative, Laparoscopic cholecystectomy, Outcome

Citation Information : Suthar KR, Vyas PH, Patel NJ, Parikh SG, Solanki GK. Evaluative Study of Outcome of Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy. World J Lap Surg 2023; 16 (2):84-87.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10033-1564

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 20-12-2023

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2023; The Author(s).


Background: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in management of gallbladder (GB) diseases requires scrutiny in term of indications, success and failure to give benefit to the patient. Its relevance and validity require to be assessed in present era. Materials and methods: The study is carried out on patients admitted to municipal general hospitals of Ahmedabad. A total of 100 patients were observed and data were collected in the prescribed proforma consisting of details of the patient's history, clinical findings, pathological findings, radiological findings, operative findings, postoperative outcome. Results: Observation and analysis of the data of the present series were interesting and important aspects were compared with the standard series. Injury to the biliary tree was the common reason for the conversion of laparoscopic cholecystectomy to open cholecystectomy. Conclusion: With proper laparoscopic training and increasing experience of surgeons there is less chance to conversion of an open approach. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is the best in terms of early recovery to routine life without any significant morbidity to the patient.

  1. Kapoor T, Wrenn SM, Callas PW, et al. Cost analysis and supply utilization of laparoscopic cholecystectomy 2018;(Article ID: 7838103):5. DOI:
  2. Strasberg SM. Tokyo Guidelines for the Diagnosis of Acute Cholecystitis. J Am Coll Surg 2018;227(6):624. DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2018.09.005.
  3. Wu YV, Linehan DC. Bile duct injuries in the era of laparoscopic cholecystectomies. Surg Clin North Am 2010;90(4):787–802. DOI: 10.1016/j.suc.2010.04.019.
  4. Roslyn JJ, Binns GS, Hughes EF, et al. Open cholecystectomy. A contemporary analysis of 42,474 patients. Ann Surg 1993;218(2): 129–137. DOI: 10.1097/00000658-199308000-00003.
  5. Strasberg SM, Hertl M, Soper NJ. An analysis of the problem of biliary injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Am Coll Surg 1995;180(1):101–125. PMID: 8000648.
  6. Duca S, Bãlã O, Al-Hajjar N. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: Incidents and complications. A retrospective analysis of 9542 consecutive laparoscopic operations. HPB (Oxford) 2003;5(3):152–158. DOI: 10.1080/13651820310015293.
  7. Seymore, Shwartz. Gall bladder and extrahepatic biliary system. In: Schwartz Seymore I (Ed). Principles of Surgery, 4th edition. S.L.: McGraw Hill International Book Co; 1984. pp. 1307–1343.
  8. Janakan G, Ayantunde AA, Hoque H. Acute gallbladder torsion: An unexpected intraoperative finding. World J Emerg Surg 2008;3:9. DOI:
  9. Misawa T, Saito R, Shiba H, et al. Analysis of bile duct injuries (Stewart-Way classification) during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 2006;13(5):427–434. DOI: 10.1007/s00534-006-1099-z.
  10. Veen EJ, Bik M, Janssen-Heijnen ML, et al. Outcome measurement in laparoscopic cholecystectomy by using a prospective complication registry: Results of an audit. Int J Qual Health Care 2008;20(2):144–151. DOI: 10.1093/intqhc/mzm073.
  11. Radunovic M, Lazovic R, Popovic N, et al. Complications of laparoscopic cholecystectomy: Our experience from a retrospective analysis. Open Access Maced J Med Sci 2016;4(4):641–646. DOI: 10.3889/oamjms.2016.128.
  12. Mjäland O, Adamsen S, Hjelmquist B, et al. Cholecystectomy rates, gallstone prevalence, and handling of bile duct injuries in Scandinavia. A comparative audit. Surg Endosc 1998;12(12): 1386–1389. DOI: 10.1007/s004649900864.
  13. Taki-Eldin A, Badawy AE. Outcome of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients with gallstone disease at a secondary level care hospital. Arq Bras Cir Dig 2018;31(1):e1347. DOI: 10.1590/0102-67202018000 1e1347.
  14. Paredes Cotore JP, Carrillo Pallarés A, Ramírez Felipe JA. La colecistectomía laparoscópica en España: Estudio multicéntrico de 2.432 enfermos [Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in Spain: Multicentric study of 2,432 patients]. Rev Esp Enferm Dig 1994;85(1):19–26. Spanish. PMID: 8185998.
  15. Al-Kubati WR. Bile duct injuries following laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A clinical study. Saudi J Gastroenterol 2010;16(2):100–104. DOI: 10.4103/1319-3767.61236.
  16. Haynes JH, Guha SC, Taylor SG. Laparoscopic cholescystectomy in a rural family practice: The Vivian, LA, experience. J Fam Pract 2004;53(3):205–208; discussion 209–212. PMID: 15000926.
  17. Tambyraja AL, Kumar S, Nixon SJ. Outcome of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients 80 years and older. World J Surg 2004;28(8):745–748. DOI: 10.1007/s00268-004-7378-4.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.