World Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery

Register      Login

VOLUME 2 , ISSUE 3 ( September-December, 2009 ) > List of Articles

RESEARCH ARTICLE

Laparoscopic Instruments Marking Improve Length Measurement Precision

S Isreb, AJ Hildreth, K Mahawar, S Balupuri, P Small

Citation Information : Isreb S, Hildreth A, Mahawar K, Balupuri S, Small P. Laparoscopic Instruments Marking Improve Length Measurement Precision. World J Lap Surg 2009; 2 (3):57-60.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10007-1038

Published Online: 01-12-2009

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2009; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.


Abstract

Introduction

Bariatric surgery has increased the demand for accurate laparoscopic bowel length measurement. Measures to achieve such precision are scarce in the medical literature. Our study investigates the effect of instruments marking on measurement precision.

Methods

Eight consultants and fourteen senior trainees with laparoscopic experience were asked to estimate 150 cm on a piece of string fixed within a standard laparoscopic training stack. Each candidate carried out three pairs of measurement using standard laparoscopic instruments without marking, with 10 cm and with 5 cm mark. Each measurement was timed separately. Candidates were result blinded to prevent any self-correction. Data were analyzed using Bland-Altman plots along with ANOVA tests.

Results

Greater accuracy was achieved via marked instrumentation, the differences being statistically significant (P < 0.01). The improvement was significant regardless of candidates’ level or initial length judgment. Time was almost doubled for the marked measurement. No statistically significance differences were found between the 5 or 10 cm instrument markings for measurement or time.

Conclusions

Marked laparoscopic instrument is a simple and effective way of enhancing length measurement precision regardless of surgeons’ experience.


PDF Share
  1. Meckel's diverticulum. Br J Surg 1961;48:392-99.
  2. Searching for the best weight reduction operation. Surgery 1984;96:624-31.
  3. An experimental evaluation of the nutritional importance of proximal and distal small intestine. Ann Surg 1954;140:439-48.
  4. Overview of operations for morbid obesity. World J Surg 1998;22:913-18.
  5. Surgical Treatment of Obesity. Philadelphia, London, Toronto: WB Saunders 1981.
  6. Gastric bypass in obesity. Surg Clin North Am 1967;47(6):1345-51.
  7. Surgery for the Morbidly Obese Patient. Philadelphia: Lea and Febiger 1989.
  8. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 1999;11(2):99-103.
  9. Biliopancreatic diversion with a duodenal switch. Obes Surg 1998;8:267-82.
  10. Laparoscopicm gastric banding: Preliminary series. Obes Surg 1993;3(2):207-09.
  11. Laparoscopic gastric bypass, Roux-en-Y: Preliminary report of five cases. Obes Surg 1994;4(4):353-57.
  12. Laparoscopic Roux-en- Y Gastric Bypass Using the Porcine Model. New York Springer; 2001;11(1):46-53.
  13. Minimally Invasive Bariatric Surgery. New York; Springer; 2007.
  14. Mastery of Endoscopic and Laparoscopic Surgery (3rd ed). Lippincott Williams and Wilkins 2008.
  15. Resolution and magnification of the laparoscope: An observational analysis. Revista Mexicana de Cirugía Endoscópica 2004.
  16. Distance perception as a function of photographic area of view. Percepnon and Psychophysics 1989.
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.