World Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery

Register      Login

VOLUME 3 , ISSUE 1 ( January-April, 2010 ) > List of Articles


Laparoscopy in Colorectal Malignancies: Current Concepts

Kaundinya Kiran Bharatam

Citation Information : Bharatam KK. Laparoscopy in Colorectal Malignancies: Current Concepts. World J Lap Surg 2010; 3 (1):27-30.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10007-1077

Published Online: 01-08-2012

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2010; The Author(s).


Laparoscopic surgery has widely spread in the treatment of colorectal cancer. For colorectal cancers, many randomized controlled trials regarding short-term outcome demonstrate that laparoscopic surgery is feasible, safe and has many benefits including reduction in a perioperative mortality. In terms of long-term outcome, four randomized controlled trials insist that there are no differences in both laparoscopic and open surgeries proving oncologic safety and that the long-term outcome is at least not inferior to open resection. However, there are still more important issues including long-term oncological outcome for advanced colon cancer, costeffectiveness and the impact on quality of life of patients.

PDF Share
  1. Laparoscopically assisted colon resection for colon carcinoma: Perioperative results and long-term outcome. Surg Endosc 2000;14:1062-66.
  2. Factors affecting intravenous analgesic requirements after colectomy. J Am Coll Surg 2003;197:780-85.
  3. Laparoscopyassisted colectomy versus open colectomy for treatment of nonmetastatic colon cancer: A randomised trial. Lancet 2002;359:2224-29.
  4. Laparoscopic colectomy for colon cancer: A trial update. Swiss Surg 2001;7:248-51.
  5. Importance of demographic variables in colorectal cancer. Southeastern Surgical Congress, Savannah, Georgia, February 2003;9-11.
  6. Guidelines 2000 for colon and rectal cancer surgery. J Natl Cancer Inst 2001;93:583-96.
  7. Port-site metastases following laparoscopic surgery. Br J Surg 1998;85:735-41.
  8. Abdominal wall metastases following laparoscopy. Br J Surg 1994;81:648-52.
  9. Peritoneal macrophage and blood monocyte functions after open and laparoscopicassisted cecectomy in rats. Surg Endosc 2003;17:1996-2002.
  10. Exposure of the peritoneal cavity to air regulates early inflammatory responses to surgery in a murine model. Br J Surg 1995;82:1060-85.
  11. Mechanism of decreased in vitro murine macrophage cytokine release after exposure to carbon dioxide: Relevance to laparoscopic surgery. Ann Surg 1997;226:179-90.
  12. Response of serum interleukin-6 in patients undergoing elective surgery of varying severity. Clin Sci (Lond) 1990;79:161-65.
  13. Inflammatory response after laparoscopic and conventional colorectal resections— results of a prospective randomized trial. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2000;385:2-9.
  14. Lancet 2005;365:1718-26.
  15. Br J Surg 1995;82:295-98.
  16. Br J Surg 2001;88:801-07.
  17. Bladder and sexual function following resection for rectal cancer in a randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open technique. Br J Surg 2005;92:1124-32.
  18. Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: Short-term outcomes of a randomised trial. Lancet Oncol 2005;6:477-84.
  19. Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assistedsurgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomized controlled trial. Lancet 2005;365:1718-26.
  20. The mesorectum in rectal cancer surgery E the clue to pelvic recurrence? Br J Surg 1982;69:613-16.
  21. Long-term results of laparoscopic versus open resectionsfor rectal cancer for 124 unselected patients. Surg Endosc 2003;17:1530-35.
  22. Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer: A meta-analysis. Ann Surg Oncol 2006;13:413-24.
  23. Meta-analysis of short-term outcomes after laparoscopic resection for rectalcancer. Int J Colorectal Dis 2006;21:652-56.
  24. Proposed phase II trial comparing laparoscopic-assisted colectomy versus open colectomy for colon cancer. In: Journal of the National Cancer Institute monographs. No. 19. Bethesda, Md.: National Cancer Institute, 1995:51-56 (NIH publication no. 9403839).
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.