World Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery

Register      Login

VOLUME 4 , ISSUE 2 ( May-August, 2011 ) > List of Articles

REVIEW ARTICLE

Does Timing of Laparoscopic Bile Duct Injury Repair affect Long-term Outcome?

Haile M Mezghebe

Citation Information : Mezghebe HM. Does Timing of Laparoscopic Bile Duct Injury Repair affect Long-term Outcome?. World J Lap Surg 2011; 4 (2):81-83.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10007-1121

Published Online: 01-08-2011

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2011; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.


Abstract

Objective

This article will review the controversies and prevailing views that deal with the vexing questions of “what is the optimal time of repair” that delivers the best long-term outcome following laparoscopic surgery injury of bile duct system.

Materials and methods

Literature review conducted using Google search engine and HighWire press, using keywords, like bile duct injuries, timing of repair, outcome and laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Results

The reported incidence of bile duct injury after laparoscopic cholecystectomy varies widely due to the inclusion or exclusion of minor or self-limited events, such as bile leak from intrahepatic radicles or leak from a cystic stump. Once a major bile duct injury occurs, early recognition is paramount to minimize morbidity and potential mortality. Once recognized, appropriate measures are instituted to address the damage. However, controversy surrounds as to the optimal time for repair of the injury. The literature gives conflicting assessment and interpretation of when such injuries should be repaired. Patients cared for in facilities that lack the expertise to perform immediate repair may inherently end up at a tertiary referral center in a delayed manner. Some recognized institutions and individual surgeons with the expertise and resources to perform immediate repair opt for repair without delay claiming good outcomes while others delay the repair to intermediate and late repairs with claims of equally good outcomes reported.

Conclusion

While immediate recognition of any injury is mandatory for improved patient outcome, the timing of repair remains controversial with convincing arguments on both sides of the issue. However, there seems to be more evidence to support either immediate repair in experienced hands or delayed repair beyond six weeks. Intermediate repair (within 3 to 14 days) is more likely to lead to failures and long-term complications.


PDF Share
  1. Bile duct injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A prospective nationwide series. J Am Coll Surg 1997;184:571-78.
  2. Bile duct injury during cholecystectomy and survival in medicare beneficiaries. Jama 2003;290:2168-73.
  3. Mirizzi syndrome: History, present and future development. ANZ J Surg 2006;76:251-57.
  4. Early specialist repair of biliary injury. Br J Surg 2006. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int, 15 October 2007;6:5.
  5. Bile duct injuries associated with laparoscopic and open cholecystectomy: An 11-year experience in one institute. Surg Today 2005;35:841-45.
  6. Nature, aetiology and outcome of bile duct injuries after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. HPB 2000;2:3-12.
  7. World J Gastroenterol 2007;13(16):2374-78.
  8. Complications of cholecystectomy: Risks of the laparoscopic approach and protective effects of operative cholangiography. A populationbased study. Ann Surg 1999;229:449-57.
  9. Arch Surg 2010;145(8):763.
  10. Arch Surg 2010;145(8):757-63.
  11. J Heptobiliary Pancreatic Surg 2007;14:476-79.
  12. Dig Surg 2002;19:117-22.
  13. Surgery 2007;142(4):450-56.
  14. Laparoscopic injuries to the bile duct. Ann Surg 1992;215:203-08.
  15. Postoperative bile duct strictures: Management and outcome in the 1990s. Ann Surg 2000;232:430-41.
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.