World Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery

Register      Login

VOLUME 4 , ISSUE 3 ( September-December, 2011 ) > List of Articles

REVIEW ARTICLE

Laparoscopic vs Open Pyeloplasty

Ahmed Nihad Abtar

Citation Information : Abtar AN. Laparoscopic vs Open Pyeloplasty. World J Lap Surg 2011; 4 (3):146-148.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10007-1133

Published Online: 00-12-2011

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2011; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.


Abstract

Conclusion

Most of the studies agreed on that LP had less morbidity and less hospital stay than OP, but the main disadvantage was the longer operative time.


PDF Share
  1. Campbellwalsh urology (9th ed). Management of upper urinary tract Obstruction 2007.
  2. Laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty. J Urol 1993;150:1795-99.
  3. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty: A pilot study. Urology 1999;53:1099-1103.
  4. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty: Evolution of a new gold standard. Urology 2006;67(5):932-36.
  5. Laparoscopic Surgery 2008;149-50.
  6. Comparison of laparoscopic and open pyeloplasty in 100 patients with pelviureteric junction obstruction. Surg Endosc 2008;22:411-14.
  7. Laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty: Our experience in 15 cases. World Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery, May-Aug 2009;2(2):6-11.
  8. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction: Outcome of initial 12 procedures. International Journal of Urology 2004;11:449-55.
  9. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty. Urol Clin North Am 2000;27:695-704.
  10. The absence of crossing vessels in association with ureteropelvic junction obstruction detected by prenatal ultrasonography. J Urol 1998;160:973-75.
  11. Laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty: 50 consecutive cases. BJU Int 2001;88:526-31.
  12. Long-term results and late recurrence after endoureteropyelotomy: A critical analysis of prognostic factors. J Urol 1994;151:934-37.
  13. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty: The first decade. BJU International 2004;94:264-67.
  14. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty for secondary ureteropelvic junction obstruction. J Urol 2003;169:2037-40.
  15. Laparoscopic treatment for ureteropelvic junction obstruction. Urology 2002:60;973-78.
  16. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty: The first 100 cases. J Urol 2002;167:1253-56.
  17. Extraperitoneal laparoscopic pyeloplasty: A multicenter study of 55 procedures. J Urol 2001;166:48-50.
  18. Contribution of lumboscopy to the treatment of ureteropelvic junction syndromes, based on a series of 25 cases. Progr Urol 2000;10:524-28.
  19. Nephrectomy: Comparative study between the transperitoneal and retroperitoneal laparoscopic versus the open approach. Eur Urol 1998;33:489-96.
  20. Extraperitoneal laparoscopic repair of ureteropelvic junction obstruction: Initial experience in 15 cases. Urology 2000;56:45-48.
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.