World Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery

Register      Login

VOLUME 7 , ISSUE 3 ( September-December, 2014 ) > List of Articles


Laparoscopic Appendectomy: Is it the Gold Standard Approach for Management of Acute Appendicitis?

MA Bahram

Citation Information : Bahram M. Laparoscopic Appendectomy: Is it the Gold Standard Approach for Management of Acute Appendicitis?. World J Lap Surg 2014; 7 (3):116-120.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10033-1230

Published Online: 01-06-2010

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2014; The Author(s).



Evaluation of laparoscopic approach for management of patients with confirmed or suspected acute appendicitis.


Although appendicitis is the most common condition requiring surgery in patients with right lower abdominal pain, this pain can be indicative of a vast list of differential diagnoses and is thus a challenge for clinicians. A definite diagnosis is obtained in 96% of patients undergoing laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) compared with 72% of those undergoing open procedures so patients can avoid the disadvantages of misdiagnosis beside other benefits of La.

Study design

A prospective outcome analysis was done for 573 patients over the last 6 years, from 2008 to 2013. All patients were planned to go for la. Modified Alvarado scoring system was used as a guide in diagnosing all patients. The following were recorded: operative time, conversion to open procedure, intraoperative findings, infection complications and length of hospital stay.


The mean operative time in this study was 42 ± 17.54 minutes. Nonappendiceal pathology was found in 31 patients (5.4%). Conversion to open procedure was done in 11 patients (1.9%). The accurate pathology was detected in 535 (93.3%) patients. The infection complications had occurred in 16 patients (2.6% of all patients). The mean hospital stay in this study was 1 ± 0.21 days.


Laparoscopic appendectomy is safe and can provide less postoperative morbidity, accurate method in diagnosing abdominal pathology other than acute appendicitis, and drawbacks of undiagnosed or misdiagnosed pathology that mimic acute appendicitis can be avoided.


OA: Open appendectomy; LA: Laparoscopic appendectomy; CT: Computed tomography; ECG: Electrocardiography; SPSS: Statistical package for the social sciences; DM: Diabetic mellitus; HCV: Hepatitis C virus; IAA: Intra-abdominal abscess.

How to cite this article

Bahram MA. Laparoscopic Appendectomy: Is it the Gold Standard Approach for Management of Acute Appendicitis? World J Lap Surg 2014;7(3):116-120.

PDF Share
  1. Beyond appendicitis: common and uncommon gastrointestinal causes of right lower quadrant abdominal pain at multi-detector CT1. Radio Graphics 2011;31:927-947.
  2. Laparoscopic approach versus laparotomy for suspected acute appendicitis. G Chir 2002;23:440-444.
  3. An international survey of opinion regarding investigation of possible appendicitis and laparoscopic management of a macroscopically normal appendix. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2012;94:476-480.
  4. Should every patient undergoing laparoscopy for clinical diagnosis of appendicitis have an appendicectomy? Acta Chir Belg 2003;103:87-89.
  5. Endoscopic appendectomy. Endoscopy 1983;15: 59-64.
  6. Acute appendicitis: what is the gold standard of treatment? World J Gastroenterol 2013 Dec 21;19(47):8799-8807.
  7. Study On modified alvarado scoring system in diagnosing acute appendicitis. Int J Cur Res Rev 2012 Nov;4(21):91-94.
  8. Outcomes and cost analysis of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for treatment of acute appendicitis: 4 years experience in a district hospital. BMC Surgery 2014;14:14.
  9. Laparoscopic vs open appendectomy; which method to choose? A prospective randomized comparison. Acta Medica Iranica, 2011;49(6):352-356.
  10. Laparoscopy should be the approach of choice for acute appendicitis in morbidly obese. Am J Surg 2008;196:218-222.
  11. Laparoscopic vs open appendectomy: which way to go? World J Gastroenterol 2008 Aug 21;14(31):4909-4914.
  12. Choice of approach for appendicectomy: a meta-analysis of open vs laparoscopic appendicectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2007;17:245-255.
  13. Laparoscopic vs conventional appendectomy—a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. BMC Gastroenterol 2010;10:129.
  14. Laparoscopic vs open appendectomy in the management of all stages of acute appendicitis in children: a retrospective study. Pediatrics and Neonatology 2012;53:289-294.
  15. Meta-analysis of the results of randomized controlled trials that compared laparoscopic and open surgery for acute appendicitis. J Gastrointest Surg 2012;16: 1929-1939.
  16. Laparoscopic appendectomy in children: technically feasible and safe in all stages of acute appendicitis. Am Surg 2004;70:198-201.
  17. Laparoscopy in children with complicated appendicitis. J Pediatr Surg 2002;37:1317-1320.
  18. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in children with uncomplicated and complicated appendicitis. J Pediatr Surg 2004;39:1680-1685.
  19. Choice of approach for appendicectomy: a meta-analysis of open versus laparoscopic appendicectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2007;17:245-255.
  20. Infectious complications following laparoscopic appendectomy. Can J Surg 2006;49:397-400.
  21. Intra-abdominal abscesses and laparoscopic vs open appendectomies. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2009;30:713-715.
  22. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for acute appendicitis: a meta-analysis. Surg Endosc 2011;25:1199-1208.
  23. Intra-abdominal abscess rate after laparoscopic appendectomy. Am J Surg 2000;180:456-461.
  24. Laparoscopic or open appendectomy: critical review of the literature and personal experience. G Chir 2001;22:353-357.
  25. Laparoscopic vs open surgery for suspected appendicitis. Cochrane Data base Syst Rev 2002;(1):CD001546.
  26. If not appendicitis, then what else can it be? A retrospective review of 1492 appendectomies. Hong Kong Med J 2010;16:12-17.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.