Comparison between Robotic Radical Hysterectomy with Laparoscopic and Open Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy in the Treatment of Early Stage Cervical Cancer
Citation Information :
Busmar B. Comparison between Robotic Radical Hysterectomy with Laparoscopic and Open Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy in the Treatment of Early Stage Cervical Cancer. World J Lap Surg 2015; 8 (1):26-31.
Cancer fact sheet. Incidence, mortality. Internet. Acessed on Feb 18, 2012.
Laparoscopic versus open radical hysterectomy in early-stage cervical cancer: long term survival outcomes in a match cohort study. Ann Oncol 2012 August 12.
Laparoscopic hysterectomy for benign diseases. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2005;19(3):357-375.
Textbook of practical laparoscopic surgery. 2nd ed. New Delhi: Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD; 2009.
Robot-assisted radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: review of surgical and oncological outcomes. Obstet Gynecol 2011;2011:872434.
Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy in early invasive cervical cancer. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2011 Sep-Oct;18(5):555-568.
Robot-assisted laparoscopic radical hysterectomy: comparison with total laparoscopic hysterectomy and abdominal radical hysterectomy; one surgeon's experience at the Norwegian Radium Hospital. Gynecol Oncol 2011 Jun 1;121(3):600-604.
Robot-assisted versus total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy in early cervical cancer, a review. Gynecol Oncol 2011 Mar;120(3):334-339.
Robotics versus laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy in patients with early cervical cancer: a multicenter study. Ann Surg Oncol 2011 Sep;18(9):2622-2628.
A comparative study of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with radical abdominal hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer: a long-term follow-up study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2011 May;156(1):83-86.
A multiinstitutional experience with roboticassisted radical hysterectomy for early stage cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2009 May;113(2):191-194.
A comparison of robotassisted and traditional radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer. J Robotic Surg 2009;3:19-23.
A case matched analysis of robotic radical hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy compared with laparoscopy and laparotomy. Gynecol Oncol 2009 Jun;113(3):357-361.
Robotic radical hysterectomy versus total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy for treatment of early cervical cancer. JSLS 2008 Jul-Sep;12(3):227-237.
A case control study of robotic radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy using 3 robotic arm compared with abdominal radical hysterectomy in cervical cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2010 Oct 20;20(7):1284-1289.
Robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery in gynecological oncology; initial experience at Oslo Radium hospital and 16 months follow-up. Int J Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surg 2009;5(4):410-414.
Vaginal cuff closure after minimally invasive hysterectomy: our experience and systematic review of the literature. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2011 Aug;205(2):119.e1-12.
Rate of vaginal cuff separation following laparoscopic or robotic hysterectomy. Gynecol Oncol 2011 Jan;120(1):47-51.
Incidence and characteristics of patients with vaginal cuff dehiscence after robotic procedures. Obstet Gynecol 2009 Aug;114(2 Pt 1):231-235.
Robotic radical hysterectomy: comparison with laparoscopy and laparotomy. Gynecologic Oncology 2008;109(1):86-91.
Robotic versus open radical hysterectomy: a comparative study at a single institution. Gynecol Oncol 2008 Dec;111(3):425-430.
A case-control study of robot-assisted type III radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymph node dissection compared with open radical hysterectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008 Oct;199(4):357.e1-7.
Survival outcomes for women undergoing type III robotic radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: a 3-year experience. Gynecologic Oncology 2010;117(2):260-265.