World Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery

Register      Login

SEARCH WITHIN CONTENT

FIND ARTICLE

Volume / Issue

Online First

Archive
Volume  17 (2024)
Volume  16 (2023)
Volume  15 (2022)
Volume  14 (2021)
Volume  13 (2020)
Volume  12 (2019)
Volume  11 (2018)
Volume  10 (2017)
Volume  9 (2016)
Volume  8 (2015)
Volume  7 (2014)
Volume  6 (2013)
Volume  5 (2012)
Volume  4 (2011)
Volume  3 (2010)
Volume  2 (2009)
Volume  1 (2008)
Related articles

VOLUME 8 , ISSUE 1 ( January-April, 2015 ) > List of Articles

RESEARCH ARTICLE

Comparison between Robotic Radical Hysterectomy with Laparoscopic and Open Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy in the Treatment of Early Stage Cervical Cancer

Boy Busmar

Citation Information : Busmar B. Comparison between Robotic Radical Hysterectomy with Laparoscopic and Open Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy in the Treatment of Early Stage Cervical Cancer. World J Lap Surg 2015; 8 (1):26-31.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10033-1241

Published Online: 01-09-2010

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2015; The Author(s).


Abstract

How to cite this article

Busmar B. Comparison between Robotic Radical Hysterectomy with Laparoscopic and Open Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy in the Treatment of Early Stage Cervical Cancer. World J Lap Surg 2015;8(1):26-31.

PDF Share
  1. Cancer fact sheet. Incidence, mortality. Internet. Acessed on Feb 18, 2012.
  2. Laparoscopic versus open radical hysterectomy in early-stage cervical cancer: long term survival outcomes in a match cohort study. Ann Oncol 2012 August 12.
  3. Laparoscopic hysterectomy for benign diseases. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2005;19(3):357-375.
  4. Textbook of practical laparoscopic surgery. 2nd ed. New Delhi: Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD; 2009.
  5. Robot-assisted radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: review of surgical and oncological outcomes. Obstet Gynecol 2011;2011:872434.
  6. Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy in early invasive cervical cancer. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2011 Sep-Oct;18(5):555-568.
  7. Robot-assisted laparoscopic radical hysterectomy: comparison with total laparoscopic hysterectomy and abdominal radical hysterectomy; one surgeon's experience at the Norwegian Radium Hospital. Gynecol Oncol 2011 Jun 1;121(3):600-604.
  8. Robot-assisted versus total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy in early cervical cancer, a review. Gynecol Oncol 2011 Mar;120(3):334-339.
  9. Robotics versus laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy in patients with early cervical cancer: a multicenter study. Ann Surg Oncol 2011 Sep;18(9):2622-2628.
  10. A comparative study of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with radical abdominal hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer: a long-term follow-up study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2011 May;156(1):83-86.
  11. A multiinstitutional experience with roboticassisted radical hysterectomy for early stage cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2009 May;113(2):191-194.
  12. A comparison of robotassisted and traditional radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer. J Robotic Surg 2009;3:19-23.
  13. A case matched analysis of robotic radical hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy compared with laparoscopy and laparotomy. Gynecol Oncol 2009 Jun;113(3):357-361.
  14. Robotic radical hysterectomy versus total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy for treatment of early cervical cancer. JSLS 2008 Jul-Sep;12(3):227-237.
  15. A case control study of robotic radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy using 3 robotic arm compared with abdominal radical hysterectomy in cervical cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2010 Oct 20;20(7):1284-1289.
  16. Robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery in gynecological oncology; initial experience at Oslo Radium hospital and 16 months follow-up. Int J Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surg 2009;5(4):410-414.
  17. Vaginal cuff closure after minimally invasive hysterectomy: our experience and systematic review of the literature. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2011 Aug;205(2):119.e1-12.
  18. Rate of vaginal cuff separation following laparoscopic or robotic hysterectomy. Gynecol Oncol 2011 Jan;120(1):47-51.
  19. Incidence and characteristics of patients with vaginal cuff dehiscence after robotic procedures. Obstet Gynecol 2009 Aug;114(2 Pt 1):231-235.
  20. Robotic radical hysterectomy: comparison with laparoscopy and laparotomy. Gynecologic Oncology 2008;109(1):86-91.
  21. Robotic versus open radical hysterectomy: a comparative study at a single institution. Gynecol Oncol 2008 Dec;111(3):425-430.
  22. A case-control study of robot-assisted type III radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymph node dissection compared with open radical hysterectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008 Oct;199(4):357.e1-7.
  23. Survival outcomes for women undergoing type III robotic radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: a 3-year experience. Gynecologic Oncology 2010;117(2):260-265.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.