World Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery

Register      Login

VOLUME 11 , ISSUE 3 ( September-December, 2018 ) > List of Articles


Role of Robotic Surgery in Gynecologic Oncology in India

R Anjali

Keywords : Da vinci robotic surgical system, Gynecologic oncology, Robotic surgery

Citation Information : Anjali R. Role of Robotic Surgery in Gynecologic Oncology in India. World J Lap Surg 2018; 11 (3):135-137.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10033-1345

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 01-08-2019

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2018; The Author(s).


Aim: This article aimed to study the role of robotic surgery in gynecologic oncology in India over the past decade. Background: Different randomized and observational, retrospective and prospective studies that met the eligibility criteria were included. Various parameters were compared between robotic and laparoscopic surgeries. The different parameters evaluated in the studies were operative time, estimated blood loss, hospital stay, complications, conversion rates, so on and so forth. Nodal yield, vaginal margin and paracervical clearance were studied in a few of them. PubMed was the main search engine utilized for searching the study data. Review results: After careful analysis of the data, it was noted that the complication rate, blood loss, and postsurgery hospitalization were significantly lower with robotics, whereas some inconsistencies were noted regarding the operating time. Conclusion: India is notably at the brink of a revolution. The need of the hour is to make this new surgically innovative technology accessible to all—to the surgeons as well as the patients. Clinical significance: Critical analysis of robotic surgeries in gynecology in Indian setting has been done. This would help in planning adoption and training of this upcoming domain.

  1. Dogra PN. Current Status of Robotic Surgery in India. JIMSA 2012; 25(3):145–146.
  2. Mahesh D, Jaspreet C, et al. Robotic surgery is ready for prime time in India: for the motion. J Minim Access Surg January–March 2015;11(1):2–4. DOI: 10.4103/0972-9941.147649.
  3. Lesley BC, Pedro TR, et al. Role of minimally invasive surgery in gynecologic oncology: an updated survey of members of the Society of Gynecologic Oncology. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2015;25(6): 1121–1127. DOI: 10.1097/IGC.0000000000000450.
  4. Patricia M, Gilles H, et al. Cost-Effectiveness of Conventional vs Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopy in Gynecologic Oncologic Indications. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2015;25(6):1102–1108. DOI: 10.1097/IGC.0000000000000458.
  5. Shailesh PP, Nallapothula K, et al. Indian Experience of Robotics in Gynecology. J Minim Access Surg 2014;10(2):80–83. DOI: 10.4103/0972-9941.129957.
  6. Weinberg L, Rao S, et al. Robotic surgery in gynecology: an updated systematic review. Obstet Gynecol Int 2011;2011(5):852061. DOI: 10.1155/2011/852061.
  7. Boggess JF, Gehrig PA, et al. A case-control study of robot-assisted type III radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymph node dissection compared with open radical hysterectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008;199(357):e1–e7. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2008.06.058.
  8. Lowe MP, Chamberlain DH, et al. A multiinstitutional experience with robotic-assisted radical hysterectomy for early stage cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2009;113(2):191–194. DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2009.01.018.
  9. Shailesh P, Geetanjali A, et al. Robotic Oncological Survey: Our Initial Experience of 164 Cases. Indian J Surg Onco 2012;3(2):96–100. DOI: 10.1007/s13193-011-0096-0.
  10. Hollaway RW, Patel SD, et al. Robotic Surgery in Gynecology. Scan J Surg 2009;98:96–109.
  11. Yim GW, Kim SW, et al. Learning curve analysis of robot-assisted radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: initial experience at a single institution. J Gynecol Oncol 2013;24(4):303–312. DOI: 10.3802/jgo.2013.24.4.303.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.