World Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery

Register      Login

VOLUME 15 , ISSUE 1 ( January-April, 2022 ) > List of Articles

Original Article

Use of Laparoscopic vs Open Repair for Perforated Peptic Ulcers is Determined by Surgeon Experience

Omar El-Ghazzawy, Christian Massier, William Walsh, Dwayne North, Abhiram Kondajji, Tu Chao

Keywords : Laparoscopic, Minimally invasive surgery, Perforated peptic ulcer

Citation Information : El-Ghazzawy O, Massier C, Walsh W, North D, Kondajji A, Chao T. Use of Laparoscopic vs Open Repair for Perforated Peptic Ulcers is Determined by Surgeon Experience. World J Lap Surg 2022; 15 (1):40-46.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10033-1489

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 13-06-2022

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2022; The Author(s).


Introduction: The incidence of perforated peptic ulcers (PPU) has decreased with effective medical treatment such that surgical repair has become a relatively infrequent procedure. We hypothesized that the surgeon's experience and the patient's clinical presentation are the most influential factors that determined the surgical approach. Methods: A retrospective chart review of PPU repairs in the last 10 years was performed to collect surgeon demographics, patient clinical condition, comorbidities, and whether surgeries were done at a regional or tertiary site. Outcome variables included length of stay, complications, and readmissions. A multivariate analysis was used to establish statistically significant correlations. Results: Of 219 operations for PPU, 49 were started laparoscopic (23.2%), 12 were converted to open (5.7%), and 162 were performed open (76.5%). The open and laparoscopic cohorts were similar without statistical difference between the groups in terms of age, sex, comorbidities, previous steroid use, NSAID, and anticoagulation use. Surgeons who attempted laparoscopy were more likely to have completed MIS fellowship (60.2%, p <0.001). The patients who had laparoscopic repair had a significantly shorter length of stay (8.5 vs 12.6 days; p <0.01). The patients who had an open repair had slightly more complications (18.4 vs 5.4%), readmissions (5.2 vs 2.7%), and hospital mortality (12.1 vs 5.4%) than their laparoscopically treated counterparts, although none was statistically significant. Conclusion: Surgeons who completed a minimally invasive fellowship were more likely to perform a laparoscopic repair of perforated peptic ulcer, regardless of the patient's clinical presentation, comorbid conditions, and demographics. Patients who underwent laparoscopic repair had a significantly shorter LOS. Educational efforts directed toward community surgeons who do not have prior MIS training are likely to benefit patients with PUD by increasing access to laparoscopic surgery for PPU.

  1. Ramakrishnan K, Salinas R. Peptic ulcer disease. Am Fam Physician 2007;76(7):1005–1012. DOI: 10.1007/978-0-387-33754-8_344.
  2. Savarino V, Marabotto E, Zentilin P, et al. The appropriate use of proton-pump inhibitors. Minerva Med 2018;109(5):386–399. DOI: 10.23736/S0026-4806.18.05705-1.
  3. Hermansson M, Ekedahl A, Ranstam J, et al. Decreasing incidence of peptic ulcer complications after the introduction of the proton pump inhibitors, a study of the Swedish population from 1974-2002. BMC Gastroenterol 2009;9:1–13. DOI: 10.1186/1471-230X-9-25.
  4. Yuan Y, Padol IT, Hunt RH. Peptic ulcer disease today. Nat Clin Pract Gastroenterol Hepatol 2006;3(2):80–89. DOI: 10.1038/ncpgasthep0393.
  5. Svanes C. Trends in perforated peptic ulcer: Incidence, etiology, treatment, and prognosis. World J Surg 2000;24(3):277–283. DOI: 10.1007/s002689910045.
  6. Sanabria A, Villegas MI, Morales Uribe CH. Laparoscopic repair for perforated peptic ulcer disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013;2013(2). DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD004778.pub3.
  7. Siu WT, Leong HT, Li M. Laparoscopic treatment of perforated peptic ulcers. Asian J Surg 1998;21(1):22–25. DOI: 10.1097/00000658-200203000-00001.
  8. Guadagni S, Cengeli I, Galatioto C, et al. Laparoscopic repair of perforated peptic ulcer: Single-center results. Surg Endosc 2014;28(8):2302–2308. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-014-3481-2.
  9. Lau H. Laparoscopic repair of perforated peptic ulcer: a meta-analysis. Surg Endosc Other Interv Tech 2004;18(7):1013–1021. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-003-8266-y.
  10. Siu WT, Leong HT, Law BKB, et al. Laparoscopic repair for perforated peptic ulcer: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg 2002;235(3):313–319. DOI: 10.1097/00000658-200203000-00001.
  11. Lau WY, Leung KL, Kwong KH, et al. A randomized study comparing laparoscopic versus open repair of perforated peptic ulcer using suture or sutureless technique. Ann Surg 1996;224(2):131–138. DOI: 10.1097/00000658-199608000-00004.
  12. Cirocchi R, Soreide K, Di Saverio S, et al. Meta-analysis of perioperative outcomes of acute laparoscopic versus open repair of perforated gastroduodenal ulcers. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2018;85(2):417–425. DOI: 10.1097/TA.0000000000001925.
  13. Shabanzedah D, Sorenson L. Laparoscopic surgery compared with open surgery decreases surgical site infection in obese patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg 2012;256(6):934–945. DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e318269a46b.
  14. Guidelines for laparoscopic appendectomy. SAGES Publication; 2009. Available from: [Accessed July 19, 2020].
  15. Lim S, Ghosh S, Niklewski P, et al. Laparoscopic suturing as a barrier to broader adoption of laparoscopic surgery. J Soc Laparoendosc Surg 2017;21(3):1–7. DOI: 10.4293/JSLS.2017.00021.
  16. Romero P, Brands O, Nickel F, et al. Intracorporal suturing–driving license necessary? J Pediatr Surg 2014;49(7):1138–1141. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2013.12.018.
  17. Guidelines for the clinical application of laparoscopic biliary tract surgery. SAGES Publication; 2010. Available from: [Accessed July 19, 2020].
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.