World Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery

Register      Login

VOLUME 15 , ISSUE 3 ( September-December, 2022 ) > List of Articles

Original Article

The Anatomical Variations of Rouviere's Sulcus Observed during Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy in Egyptian Patients

Bahaa M El Wakeel, Wessam Mostafa Abdellatif, Ashraf Anas Zytoon, Nashwa Ghanem, Mohammed M Mogahed

Keywords : Laparoscopic cholecystectomy, Liver cirrhosis, Rouviere's sulcus

Citation Information : Wakeel BM, Abdellatif WM, Zytoon AA, Ghanem N, Mogahed MM. The Anatomical Variations of Rouviere's Sulcus Observed during Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy in Egyptian Patients. World J Lap Surg 2022; 15 (3):202-206.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10033-1527

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 08-12-2022

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2022; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.


Abstract

Background: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) became one of the most common operations worldwide. Bile duct injury usually occurs due to a failure to recognize the critical structures in Calot's triangle. A proper knowledge about biliary structures, its anatomicl variations, and identification of various anatomical landmarks is essential to make LC easy and safe. Although Rouviere's sulcus (RS) was initially described by Henri Rouviere in 1924, it is not widely known and not often incorporated in LC. In cirrhotic patients, the incidence of gallstones is higher than in general population. Aim: To determine the frequency and types of RS as seen during LC and to assess the benefits of identifying Rouvier's sulcus as an anatomical landmark in avoidance of bile ducts injury during LC in Egyptian patients. Materials and methods: A prospective study was conducted on 290 patients with gallbladder diseases, 250 non-cirrhotic (group A) and 40 cirrhotic patients (group B) who scheduled for LC at National Hepatology and Tropical Medicine Research Institute (NHTMRI), Cairo, Egypt, in a period of 30 months. Results: Among group A, RS was clearly identified as a deep sulcus in 190 patients (76%), in 40 patients (16%), RS was identified as a scar, while it was absent in the remaining 20 patients (8%). Among group B, RS was clearly identified as a deep sulcus in 9 patients (22.5%), in 11 patients (27.5%), RS was identified as a scar, while it was absent in the remaining 20 patients (50%). Conclusion: Identification of RS provides an easy landmark for starting dissection of Calot's triangle for safe LC as it facilitates the identification of the biliary and vascular structures and minimizes iatrogenic biliary injuries. Identification of RS may not be easy in liver cirrhosis and need careful dissection of vascular and biliary structures.


PDF Share
  1. Singh M, Jain A, Dey S, et al. Rouviere's sulcus and critical view of safety: a guide to prevent bile duct injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. World J Lap Surg 2018;11(1):25–28. DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10033-1328.
  2. Radunovic M, Lazovic R, Popovic N, et al. Complications of laparoscopic cholecystectomy: our Experience from a Retrospective Analysis. Open Access Maced J Med Sci 2016;4(4):641–646. DOI: 10.3889/oamjms.2016.128.
  3. Gupta V, Jain G. Safe laparoscopic cholecystectomy: adoption of universal culture of safety in cholecystectomy. World J Gastrointest Surg 2019;11(2):62–84. DOI: 10.4240/wjgs.v11.i2.62.
  4. Rouviere H. Sur la configuration et al signification du sillon du processus caude. Bulletin et Memoires de la Societe Anatomique de Paris 1924;94:355–358.
  5. Peti N, Moser MAJ. Graphic reminder of Rouviere's sulcus: a useful landmark in cholecystectomy. ANZ J Surg 2012;82(5):367–368. DOI: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.2012.06032.x.
  6. Jha AK, Dewan R, Bhaduria K. Importance of Rouviere's sulcus in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Ann Afr Med 2020;19(4):274–277. DOI: 10.4103/aam.aam_4_20.
  7. Acalovschi M. Gallstones in patients with liver cirrhosis: incidence, etiology, clinical and therapeutical aspects. World J Gastroenterol 2014;20(23):7277–7285. DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i23.7277.
  8. Mogahed M, El-Atrebi K, Elwakeel B. Prevalence of gallstone disease in Egyptian patients with hepatitis C virus infection. AAMJ 2014;12(1):257–265.
  9. Bluth EI. Ultrasound: A Practical Approach to Clinical Problems, 2nd edition. New York: Thieme, 2008.
  10. de’Angelis N, Catena F, Memeo R, et al. WSES guidelines for the detection and management of bile duct injury during cholecystectomy. World J Emerg Surg 2021;16(1):30. DOI: 10.1186/s13017-021-00369-w.
  11. Pesce A, Palmucci S, La Greca G, et al. Iatrogenic bile duct injury: impact and management challenges. Clin Exp Gastroenterol 2019;12:121–128. DOI: 10.2147/CEG.S169492.
  12. Gans H. Study of anatomy of the intrahepatic structures and its repercussions of hepatic surgery (Ph.D. thesis). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: University of Nijmegen, Elsevier, 1955.
  13. Dahmane R, Morjane A, Starc A. Anatomy and surgical relevance of Rouviere's sulcus. Sci World J 2013; 2013:254287. DOI: 10.1155/2013/254287.
  14. Hugh TB, Kelly MD, Mekisic A. Rouviere's sulcus: a useful landmark in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg 1997;84(9):1253–1254. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2168.1997.02769.x.
  15. Kumar A, Shah R, Pandit N. Anatomy of Rouviere's sulcus and its association with complication of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Minim Invasive Surg 2020;2020:3956070. DOI: 10.1155/2020/3956070.
  16. Lockhart S, Ranger GS. Rouviere's sulcus: aspects of incorporating this valuable sign for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Asian J Surg 2018;41(1):1–3. DOI: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2016.07.012.
  17. Lazarus L, Luckrajh JS, Kinoo SM, et al. Anatomical parameters of the Rouviere's sulcus for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Eur J Anat 2018;22(5):389–395. IBECS ID: ibc-179808.
  18. Garg R, Jain SK, Sharma N. Evaluation of anatomical parameters of the Rouviere's sulcus for laparoscopic cholecystectomy: an institutional based study. Int Arch BioMed Clin Res 2019;5(1):68. https://iabcr.org/index.php/iabcr/article/view/603.
  19. Hugh TB. New Strategies to prevent laparoscopic bile duct injury: surgeons can learn from pilots. Surgery 2002;132(5):826–835. DOI: 10.1067/msy.2002.127681.
  20. Shinde J, Subodh P. Innovative approach to a frozen Calot's triangle during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Indian J Surg 2015;77(6): 554–557. DOI: 10.1007/s12262-015-1354-0.
  21. Strasberg SM, Brunt LM. Rationale and use of the critical view of safety in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Am Coll Surg 2010;211:132–138. DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2010.02.053.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.