Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy versus Open Radical Hysterectomy for Carcinoma Cervix Stage 1
SB Naval
Citation Information :
Naval S. Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy versus Open Radical Hysterectomy for Carcinoma Cervix Stage 1. World J Lap Surg 2009; 2 (3):23-28.
The present review has considered good number of studies involving fair large number of patients operated with both modalities for carcinoma cervix stage 1. Minor differences in the operative techniques are ignored. Overall operation time for laparoscopic procedures was required more. Incidence of intraoperative complication was also higher in addition to inherent complications related to pneumoperitoneum. However, results in terms of disease free survival between the groups were comparable.
Advantages pertaining to reduced hospital stay and better cosmesis with laparoscopic modality at present do not outweigh the higher incidence of intraoperative complication than that in open radical hysterectomy group.
Gynecol Surg. Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and laparoscopically assisted vaginal radical hysterectomy with pelvic and para-aortic node dissection Summer 1993;9(2):105-20.
Gynecol Oncol. A comparison of laparascopic-assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy and radical abdominal hysterectomy in the treatment of cervical cancer Jun 2004;93(3):588-93.
Am J Obstet Gynecol. Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (type III) with aortic and pelvic lymphadenectomy in patients with stage I cervical cancer: Surgical morbidity and intermediate follow-up Aug2002;187(2):340-48.
Am J Obstet Gynecol. Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (type III) with aortic and pelvic lymphadenectomy. Jun 1996;174(6):1763-67;discussion 1767-68.
J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy: A Preliminary Report Aug 1994;1(4, Part 2):S32.
Obstet Gynecol. Laparoscopy-assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy modified according to Schauta-Stoeckel Dec 1996;88(6):1057-60.
Gynecol Oncol. Laparoscopically assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy Nov 1993;51(2):248-54.
Gynecol Oncol. Laparoscopic para-aortic and pelvic lymphadenectomy: Experience with 150 patients and review of the literature Oct 1998;71(1):19-28.
Am J Obstet Gynecol. Three classes of radical vaginal hysterectomy for treatment of endometrial and cervical cancer Dec 1996;175(6):1576-85.
Za Clinical evaluation of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy in patients with cervical cancer Jul 2003;38(7):409-11.
Gynecol Oncol. Introduction of transperitoneal lymphadenectomy in a gynecologic oncology center: Analysis of 650 laparoscopic pelvic and/or para-aortic transperitoneal lymphadenectomies Oct 2004;95(1):52-61.
Surg Endosc. Laparoscopically assisted radical vaginal versus radical abdominal hysterectomy type II in patients with cervical cancer Mar 2001;15(3):289-92. Epub 2000 Dec 12.
Gynecol Oncol. Laparoscopic-assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy (LARVH): Prospective evaluation of 200 patients with cervical cancerSep 2003;90(3):505-11.
Complications of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy for invasive cervical cancer: Experience based on 317 procedures 2007;21:960-64.
The Outcome of Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy and Lymphadenectomy for Cervical Cancer: A Prospective Analysis of 295 Patients Annals of Surgical Oncology 15(10):284.
Bulletin of Department of Medical Services, Thailand March 2004;29 (3).
102, No. I, M.1). Presented at the Forty-ninth Annual Meeting of the American Radium Society, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, May 1967; 29-31.
E B Radical hysterectomy for stage 1 cervical carcinoma in Northern Ireland. A five year review The Ulster Medical Journal, October 1990;59(2):183-86.
Complications of surgical treatment of cervical carcinoma Abrão, FS Breitbarg, RC Oliveira AT and Vasconcelos FA 1997;30:29-33.
