World Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery

Register      Login

VOLUME 6 , ISSUE 1 ( January-April, 2013 ) > List of Articles


A Review of Medical Education in Minimally Invasive Surgery

Shamanique Shamona Bodie

Citation Information : Bodie SS. A Review of Medical Education in Minimally Invasive Surgery. World J Lap Surg 2013; 6 (1):33-36.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10033-1178

Published Online: 01-12-2015

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2013; The Author(s).


How to cite this article

Bodie SS. A Review of Medical Education in Minimally Invasive Surgery. World J Lap Surg 2013;6(1):33-36.

PDF Share
  1. An estimation of the global volume of surgery: A modeling strategy based on available data. The Lancet 2008 Jul;372(9633):139-44.
  2. Hysterectomy Surveillance—United States, 1994-1999. MMWR 2002 Jul;51(SS05):1-8. Available from:
  3. Robotics in reproductive surgery: Strengths and limitations. Placenta 2011 Sep;32(3):S232-37.
  4. Laparoscopic surgery is not inherently dangerous for patients presenting with benign gynaecologic pathology. Results of a meta-analysis. Hum Reprod 2002;17(5):1334-42.
  5. Learning curve using robotic surgery. Current Urol Rep 2006 Mar;7(2):125-29.
  6. Learning curve in laparoscopic surgery. Minimally invasive surgery training: Theories, models, outcomes. A National Institute of Health and National Library of Medicine.
  7. The impact of the learning curve in laparoscopic surgery. Available from: .
  8. What is the learning curve for robotic assisted gynecologic surgery? J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2008;15(5):589-94.
  9. Evolution of surgical skills training. World J Gastroenterol 2006 May 28;12(20):3219-24.
  10. Operative manual for endoscopic abdominal surgery. Operative Pelviscopy. Chicago, London: Year Book Medical Publishers Inc 1987:5-15.
  11. Fitz-Hugh-Curtis syndrome. A laparoscopic approach. JAMA 1976;236:266-68.
  12. Haptics in minimally invasive surgery-A review. Minimally Invasive Ther Allied Technol 2008;17(1):3-16.
  13. Robotic gynecologic surgery: Past, present and future. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2009 Sep;52(3):335-43.
  14. Available from: 10/24/2012.
  15. Visual language to interface users of educational surgical simulators for fundamental surgical manipulations. In: Proceedings of 14th Annual International Meeting of Computer-assisted Radiology and Surgery (CARS). Lemke HJ, (Ed). San Francisco, Amsterdam: Elsevier Publishers; 2000;29-34.
  16. Metrics for objective assessment of surgical skills workshop. Surg Endosc 2003;17(2):220-26.
  17. Comparison of laparoscopic performance in vivo with performance in a laparoscopic simulator. Surg Endosc 1999;13:1077-81.
  18. Virtual reality computer simulation. Surg Endosc 2001;15(3):242-44.
  19. Virtual reality performance improves operating room performance: Results of a randomized, double-blinded trial. Ann Surg 2002;236: 458-64.
  20. Laparoscopic skills training and assessment. Br J Surg 2004 Dec;91(12):1549-58.
  21. An evidence-based virtual reality training program for novice laparoscopic surgeons. Ann Surg 2006 Aug;244(2):310-14.
  22. Development of a valid, cost-effective laparoscopic training program. Am J Surg 2004 Feb;187(2):157-63.
  23. Simulated laparoscopic operating room crisis: An approach to enhance the surgical team performance. Surg Endosc 2008 Apr;22(4):885-900.
  24. Qualitative and quantitative analysis of the learning curve of a simulated surgical task on the da Vinci system. Surg Endosc 2004 Mar;18(3):372-78.
  25. Current status of validation for robotic surgery simulators-a systematic review. BJU Int 2012 Jun 6 [Epub ahead of print].
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.