World Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery

Register      Login

SEARCH WITHIN CONTENT

FIND ARTICLE

Volume / Issue

Online First

Archive
Volume  17 (2024)
Volume  16 (2023)
Volume  15 (2022)
Volume  14 (2021)
Volume  13 (2020)
Volume  12 (2019)
Volume  11 (2018)
Volume  10 (2017)
Volume  9 (2016)
Volume  8 (2015)
Volume  7 (2014)
Volume  6 (2013)
Volume  5 (2012)
Volume  4 (2011)
Volume  3 (2010)
Volume  2 (2009)
Volume  1 (2008)
Related articles

VOLUME 8 , ISSUE 3 ( September-December, 2015 ) > List of Articles

REVIEW ARTICLE

Surgical Approaches for Rectal Prolapse and their Comparative Study

Inamull Hasan SA Shaikh

Citation Information : Shaikh IH. Surgical Approaches for Rectal Prolapse and their Comparative Study. World J Lap Surg 2015; 8 (3):90-95.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10033-1255

Published Online: 01-12-2010

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2015; The Author(s).


Abstract

How to cite this article

Shaikh IHSA. Surgical Approaches for Rectal Prolapse and their Comparative Study. World J Lap Surg 2015;8(3):90-95.

PDF Share
  1. Rectal prolapse: an overview of clinical features, diagnosis, and patient-specific management strategies. J Gastrointest Surg 2014;18:1059-1069.
  2. Rectal prolapse. Clin Colon Rectal Surg 2011;24:39-45.
  3. Defecography in normal volunteers: results and implications. Gut 1989;30:1737-1749.
  4. Evacuation proctography: a reappraisal of normal variability. Colorectal Dis 2014;16:538-546.
  5. Surgical management of rectal prolapse. Arch Surg 2005;140:63-73.
  6. Prosper: a randomised comparison of surgical treatments for rectal prolapse. Colorectal Dis 2013;15:858-868.
  7. Sutureless laparoscopic rectopexy for procidentia. Technique and implications. Dis Colon Rectum 1992;35:689-693.
  8. Robot-assisted or conventional laparoscoic rectopexy for rectal prolapse? Systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Surg 2014;12Suppl 2:S153-S159.
  9. Rectal prolapse. Abdominal or local approach. Chirurg 2008;79:444-451.
  10. Synthetic or biological mesh use in laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy: a systematic review. Colorectal Dis 2013;15:650-654.
  11. Laparoscopic ripstein procedure. Surg Laparosc Endosc 1992;2:346-347.
  12. Complete prolapse of the rectum. A report on 140 cases treated by rectopexy. Br J Surg 1971;58:847-848.
  13. Laparoscopy for pelvic floor disorders. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 2014;28:69-80.
  14. The surgical treatment of rectal procidentia. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1969;129:1225-1230.
  15. Evaluation and surgical treatment of rectal prolapse: an international survey. Colorectal Dis 2013;15:115-119.
  16. Consensus on ventral rectopexy: report of a panel of experts. Colorectal Dis 2014;16:82-88.
  17. Learning curve and case selection in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: systematic review and international multicenter analysis of 4852 cases. Dis Colon Rectum 2012;55:1300-1310.
  18. Evaluation of the learning curve in laparoscopic low anterior resection for rectal cancer. Surg Endosc 2011;25:2972-2979.
  19. Laparotomic vs. laparoscopic rectopexy in complete rectal prolapse. Dig Surg 1999;16:415-419.
  20. Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open abdominal rectopexy for rectal prolapse. Br J Surg 2002;89:35-39.
  21. Surgery for complete rectal prolapse in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2008;4:CD001758.
  22. Open vs laparoscopic surgery for rectal prolapse: a case-controlled study assessing short-term outcome. Dis Colon Rectum 2003;46:353-360
  23. Long-term outcome after laparoscopic and open surgery for rectal prolapse: a casecontrol study. Surg Endosc 2006;20:35-42.
  24. Long-term results and functional outcome after ripstein rectopexy. Dis Colon Rectum 2000;43:35-43.
  25. Recurrence and functional results after open versus conventional laparoscopic versus robotassisted laparoscopic rectopexy for rectal prolapse: a casecontrol study. Int J Colorectal Dis 2009;24:1201-1206.
  26. Open vs laparoscopic repair of full-thickness rectal prolapse: a re-meta-analysis. Colorectal Dis 2010;12:515-525.
  27. Focus on abdominal rectopexy for full-thickness rectal prolapse: meta-analysis of literature. Tech Coloproctol 2012;16:37-53.
  28. Is laparoscopic colorectal surgery beneficial for elderly patients? A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Gastrointest Surg 2015;19:756-765.
  29. Safety of laparoscopic ventral rectopexy in the elderly: results from a nationwide database. Dis Colon Rectum 2015;58:339-343.
  30. Laparoscopic ventral rectopexy in an elderly population with external rectal prolapse: clinical and a nalmanometric results. Int J Colorectal D is 2014;29:1257-1262.
  31. Outcome analysis of elderly patients undergoing laparoscopic resection rectopexy for rectal prolapse. Int J Colorectal Dis 2012;27:789-795.
  32. Laparoscopic posterior mesh rectopexy for rectal prolapse is a safe procedure in older patients: a prospective follow-up study. Scand J Surg 2015.
  33. How to deal with complications after laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy: lessons learnt from a tertiary referral centre. Colorectal Dis 2013;15:707-712.
  34. Mesh erosion after laparoscopic posterior rectopexy: a rare complication. J Minim Access Surg 2014;10:40-41.
  35. Mesh fistulation into the rectum after laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy. Int J Surg Case Rep 2014;5:152-154.
  36. Conservative treatment of intrarectal mesh migration after ventral laparoscopic rectopexy for rectal prolapse. Int J Colorectal Dis 2013;28:1563-1566.
  37. Pyogenic spondylodiscitis associated with sacral colpopexy and rectopexy: report of two cases and evaluation of the literature. Int Urogynecol J 2014;25:21-31.
  38. Lumbosacral discitis following laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy: a rare but potentially serious complication. Tech Coloproctol. 2015;19:263-265.
  39. Vertebral discitis after laparoscopic resection rectopexy: a rare differential diagnosis. J Surg Case Rep 2014;2014:pii:rju075.
  40. Economic impact of laparoscopic versus open abdominal rectopexy. Br J Surg 2004;91: 1188-1191.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.